Affiliation:
1. Department of Political Science, University of Freiburg, 79085 Freiburg, Germany
2. Department of Political Science, University of Göttingen, 37073 Göttingen, Germany
Abstract
To what extent does the use of Voting Advice Applications in (digital) civic education classes at school impact students’ political knowledge, attitudes, motivations and behavioral dispositions toward elections? This article provides answers to this question by presenting a sample analysis of the responses of 1189 pupils who participated in a digital civic education intervention, with the German Voting Advice Application Wahl-O-Mat at its core, whose usage was embedded in an elaborated didactical concept in civic education classes. Using a quasi-experimental field design with pre- and post-tests, the study shows that the intervention substantially improves students’ knowledge of the investigated state election. Furthermore, we can trace a significant increase in young people’s political efficacy and specific interest in the election campaign. Finally, we observe a substantial increase in intended electoral participation, especially among those adolescents whose intention to participate in elections was low prior to the intervention, which contributes to a reduction in existing participation gaps. In particular, we identify changes in motivational and cognitive political dispositions, but only to a limited extent evaluative and sociodemographic background variables, as key factors driving the intervention-induced change in willingness to participate in the state election. Our paper concludes by discussing the limitations of the study and its implications for empirical research and practice in civic education.
Reference78 articles.
1. Party preferences in the digital age: The impact of voting advice applications;Alvarez;Party Politics,2014
2. Garzia, Diego, and Marschall, Stefan (2014). Matching Voters with Parties and Candidates. Voting Advice Applications in Comparative Perspective, ECPR.
3. Political Efficacy in Adolescence: Development, Gender Differences, and Outcome Relations;Arens;Developmental Psychology,2017
4. Schippling, Anne, Grunert, Cathleen, and Pfaff, Nicolle (2016). Kritische Bildungsforschung: Standortbestimmungen und Gegenstandsfelder, Barbara Budrich.
5. Digital Tools and Social Science Education;Bombardelli;JSSE-Journal of Social Science Education,2016
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献