Powerful Knowledge and the 2017 Swedish National Test in Religious Education

Author:

Andersson Klas1ORCID,Börjesson Mattias1,Larsson Kristoffer1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pedagogical, Curricular and Professional Studies, University of Gothenburg, P.O. Box 100, SE 405 30 Göteborg, Sweden

Abstract

In the 21st century, there has been a recurring discussion about social realism in educational research: the idea that subject knowledge derived from academic disciplines should constitute the heart of the school curriculum. The argument is that this knowledge, because it is produced according to specific standards, is powerful knowledge, and has better claims to truth and is more valid than knowledge gained from students’ everyday experiences. Because of its validity and universality, this knowledge empowers the knower to transcend her or his everyday experiences and take part in society’s conversations, which are central goals of social studies education. The aim of this study is to identify in which ways aspects of powerful knowledge are manifested in the 2017 national test in RE. For the analysis, both items and students’ answers from the 2017 test are used. The focus with regard to the items is on whether the students are expected to demonstrate knowledge and abilities in relation to powerful knowledge. We also analyze the students’ answers to these items using the same framework.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Social Sciences

Reference46 articles.

1. Apple, Michael (1979). Ideology and Curriculum, Routledge & Kegan Paul.

2. Apple, Michael (1982). Education and Power, Routledge & Kegan Paul.

3. High-Stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis;Au;Educational Researcher,2007

4. Social Studies, Social Justice: W(h)ither the Social Studies in High-Stakes Testing?;Au;Teacher Education Quarterly,2009

5. Biesta, Gert (2021). World-Centred Education. A View for the Present, Routledge.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3