Gender Bias in the Australian Construction Industry: Women’s Experience in Trades and Semi-Skilled Roles

Author:

Holdsworth Sarah1,Turner Michelle1ORCID,Sandri Orana1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Property Construction and Project Management, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia

Abstract

While most industry sectors in the Australian workforce have consistently improved regarding the participation of women, the construction industry remains an exception. Despite multiple gender equality initiatives and regulations at all levels of the Australian Government, the proportion of women employed in the construction industry has steadily declined. In 2020, only 1% of the trades and technician positions in the Australian construction industry were filled by women. In this qualitative study, interviews were undertaken with 43 women working in trades and semi-skilled roles to identify the varying types of gender biases experienced by women and the resultant harms that these biases create. Biases consisted of challenges to credibility; characteristics of the work environment comprising support, amenities, conditions of employment, career development, and access to meaningful work; gender stereotypes about women’s work roles; and objectification. Each of these biases has a cumulative impact on women, leading to systemic and structural discrimination. The implications and suggestions for strategies to address biases are discussed, including the need for structural interventions to create epistemic justice and recognition for women working in construction.

Funder

Victorian Government in Australia

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Social Sciences

Reference41 articles.

1. Epistemic justice as a virtue of social institutions;Anderson;Social Epistemology,2012

2. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2006). Census of Population and Housing, Cat. No. 2068.0, Australian Government.

3. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2016). Labour Force, Australia, Detailed, Quarterly, Cat. No. 6291.0.55.003, Australian Government.

4. Privilege: Expanding on Marilyn Frye’s “Oppression”;Bailey;Journal of Social Philosophy,1998

5. Marks, David F., and Yardley, Lucy (2004). Research Methods for Clinical and Health Psychology, Sage.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3