The Judicial Geography of Patent Litigation in Germany: Implications for the Institutionalization of the European Unified Patent Court

Author:

Zipf Marius1,Glückler Johannes1ORCID,Khuchua Tamar2,Lazega Emmanuel2,Lachapelle François2,Hoffmann Jakob1

Affiliation:

1. Economic Geography Group, Institute of Geography, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany

2. Centre for the Sociology of Organizations, Sciences Po, 75007 Paris, France

Abstract

The Unified Patent Court (UPC) will be the pillar of a unified European patent enforcement system. Crucial to its success will be the harmonization of geographical variation in national jurisdictions. Germany offers a unique opportunity to explore such harmonization, as plaintiffs can choose between twelve regional courts to file a patent suit, resulting in different patent court practices within the same jurisdiction. Adopting a legal geography perspective, we examine the appellate process as a mechanism that reconciles regional variation in court practices. Based on more than 100 decisions from 34 contentious litigations that went through all instances up to the Federal Court of Justice between 2005 and 2019, we find that decision reversals, case citations and guiding principles are important tools to improve error correction and judicial consistency within an IP system. We see these instruments as crucial for national harmonization also in the upcoming European framework.

Funder

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

French National Research Agency

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Social Sciences

Reference93 articles.

1. Ackermann, Jan, Böttcher, Dirk, Bopp, Thomas, Burrichter, Arwed, Kircher, Holger, Kirchhofer, Natalie, Lehmeyer, Christoph, Lux, Herwig, and Sonntag, Matthias (2019). Handbuch Europäischer Patentprozess, C.H. Beck.

2. Baldan, Federica (2022). Judicial Coherence in the European Patent System: Lessons from the US and Japan, Edward Elgar Publishing.

3. The future role of the Unified Patent Court in safeguarding coherence in the European patent system;Baldan;Common Market Law Review,2015

4. Uncertainty and unpredictability in patent litigation: The time is ripe for a consistent claim construction methodology;Bender;Journal of Intellectual Property Law,2001

5. BGH (1991). Leitsätze, BGH. Decision from 21 November 1991. File Reference: I ZR 190/89.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3