Powerful Knowledge as a Conceptual Frame for Teaching Controversial Issues in Ethics and Values Education in Social Studies Subjects

Author:

Franck Olof1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pedagogical, Curricular and Professional Studies, University of Gothenburg, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden

Abstract

Much has recently been written about how teaching on “controversial issues” may be designed and developed in accordance with various pedagogical and didactic guidelines and based on a democratic ethos. In this article, I develop an analysis of the theoretical prerequisites for a tenable and solid teaching on controversial ethical issues in social-studies subjects. With reference to Diana Hess’s research, which identifies four pedagogical strategies in teaching on controversial issues in a general sense, I critically examine how these strategies can be conceived in a context where ethics and values education are taught in school. I make a claim for the importance of exploring an ethical meta-language for the establishment of a theoretical framework, defined with regard to the concept of powerful knowledge, where teachers may find support for teaching on controversial ethical issues. This claim is supported by a critical discussion of Michael Hand’s well-known defence of the “epistemic criterion”.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Social Sciences

Reference39 articles.

1. The moral contract, sympathy and becoming human: A response to Michael Hand’s A theory of moral education;Aldridge;Journal of Philosophy of Education,2019

2. Alvén, Fredrik (2017). Tänka rätt och tycka lämpligt: Historieämnet i skärningspunkten mellan att fostra kulturbärare och förbereda kulturbyggare. [Thinking Right and Thinking Appropriately: The Subject of History at the Intersection of Nurturing Culture Carriers and Preparing Culture Builders]. [Ph.D. dissertation, Malmö högskola, Fakulteten för lärande och samhälle].

3. Biesta, Gert, Aldridge, David, Hannam, Patricia, and Whittle, Sean (2023, November 03). Religious Literacy: A Way Forward for Religious Education? Brunel University London & Hampshire Inspection and Advisory Service. Available online: https://www.reonline.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Religious-Literacy-Biesta-Aldridge-Hannam-Whittle-June-2019.pdf.

4. Education in safe and unsafe spaces;Callan;Philosophical Inquiry in Education,2016

5. What is a controversial issue? Implications for the treatment of religious beliefs in education;Cooling;Journal of Beliefs & Values,2012

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3