Abstract
The direct crediting of book allowances to student accounts was, among other reasons, underpinned by the belief that students would be able to substitute prescribed study material with online content. The article attempts to understand if the local open educational resources (OER) funding policy environment was prepared for this significant transformation. The paper applied a critical theory paradigm and a documentary research strategy to identify policy-level documents on OER funding in the South African higher education sector. Content analysis was then applied to review what they said about OER funding. These outcomes were then measured against the National Policy Development Framework 2020, which also dominated the study’s conceptual framework. The study’s significant findings were that the OER funding policy did not meet the policymaking principles of the framework, and this exposed Higher Education to a poorly funded OER environment. The study recommended hastening the finalization of OER policy and the flexible application of current policy terms to include OER as a fundable higher education cause.
Reference54 articles.
1. Burgos, Daniel (2020). Radical Solutions and Open Science. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology, Springer.
2. Awolabi, Nina (2022, April 04). State Funding For Open Educational Resources. Available online: https://occrl.illinois.edu/docs/librariesprovider2/update-newsletter/state-funding-for-open-educational-resources.pdf.
3. Smith, Brett, and Sparkes, Andrew C. (2016). Routledge Handbook of Qualitative Research in Sport and Exercise, Routledge.
4. Bronner, Stephen Eric (2017). Critical Theory: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford University Press.
5. The Decline of College Textbook Publishing: Cengage Learning and McGraw-Hill;Carbaugh;The American Economist,2020