Assessing the Effects of District-Level Segregation on Meritocratic Beliefs in Germany

Author:

Oetke Nicole1ORCID,Norkus Maria1,Goebel Jan2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Sociology, Technical University Berlin, 10587 Berlin, Germany

2. SOEP, DIW Berlin, 10108 Berlin, Germany

Abstract

In recent years, researchers have grappled with the phenomenon that public demand for redistribution has not systematically increased in response to rising inequality. Meritocratic beliefs have been suggested as an explanation for this observation, because they can help legitimize inequalities. Past research has identified local-level inequality, segregation, or diversity as important factors for how these beliefs might be formed and maintained. Different theoretical approaches have been advanced and tested to determine the direction and extent of these effects, producing mixed results. We put these theories to the test by focusing on a country in which changes in the level of inequality have indeed been met with equal changes in justice perceptions: Germany. Furthermore, we broaden the scope by focusing on local segregation between different socioeconomic status groups, rather than income inequality. To do so, we utilize geocoded individual-level data from the German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP), microm data, and relevant geospatial indicators from the INKAR database. We find some indication that residential segregation of status groups and isolation of high status groups is associated with less support of meritocratic beliefs, contradicting previous work. Additionally, we find evidence of urban–rural differences in the effects of segregation.

Funder

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Social Sciences

Reference84 articles.

1. Adriaans, Jule, Bohmann, Sandra, Targa, Matteo, Liebig, Stefan, Hinz, Thomas, Jasso, Guillermina, Kittel, Bernhard, and Sabbagh, Clara (2020). Justice and Fairness in Europe: Topline Results from Round 9 of the European Social Survey, European Social Survey. Technical Report 10.

2. Theorizing the Impact of Fairness Perceptions on the Demand for Redistribution;Ahrens;Political Research Exchange,2019

3. Almås, Ingvild, Cappelen, Alexander W., Sørensen, Erik, and Tungodden, Bertil (2022). IFS Deaton Review of Inequalities, The Institute for Fiscal Studies.

4. Baba, Ludger, and Wilbert, Katrin (2022). Soziale Stadt- und Ortsentwicklung in ländlichen Räumen, BBSR Online-Publikation, Bundesinstitut für Bau-, Stadt- und Raumforsschung.

5. Living Apart, Losing Sympathy? How Neighbourhood Context Affects Attitudes to Redistribution and to Welfare Recipients;Bailey;Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space,2013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3