Psychometric Test Review of the Abusive Behaviour Inventory (ABI)

Author:

Heron Rebecca1,McAndrew Gracie2,Parsonson Karen2,Browne Kevin3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences, University of Houston-Victoria at Katy, Katy, TX 77449, USA

2. College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences, University of Houston-Victoria, Victoria, TX 77901, USA

3. Centre for Forensic and Family Psychology, University of Nottingham Medical School, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK

Abstract

This paper examines the Abusive Behaviour Inventory (ABI), which is regarded as an efficient self-report measure with demonstrated high reliability and validity. This examination aims to determine the tool’s effectiveness when screening for victims of domestic violence and present recommendations for how the device may be improved. Within this critique, the ABI is analysed through a literature review and the exploration of the tool’s development. A detailed overview of the ABI is included, and its reliability and validity are critically reviewed. Findings from the research base of this tool are presented and also discussed. While the ABI is regarded as an efficient self-report measure which has been demonstrated to have both high reliability and validity, after evaluation, implementing a structured professional judgement (SPJ) approach is recommended. This would expand the tool’s utility to include risk and safety assessment. In addition, methods and considerations for including LGBTQ relationships are introduced. Finally, implications for the ABI’s use in informing batterer intervention programs are highlighted. It is concluded that more research is warranted to continue increasing the ABI’s applicability to different intimate relationship archetypes and populations.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Social Sciences

Reference53 articles.

1. Intimate partner violence: A narrative review of the feminist, social and ecological explanations for its causation;Ali;Aggression and Violent Behavior,2013

2. A literature review of intimate partner violence and its classifications;Ali;Aggression and Violent Behavior,2016

3. Information bias in health research: Definition, pitfalls, and adjustment methods;Althubaiti;Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare,2016

4. American Psychological Association (2023, March 14). Available online: https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/.

5. Measures for screening for intimate partner violence: A systematic review;Arkins;Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3