Value of Critical Thinking in the Labour Market: Variations in Employers’ and Employees’ Views

Author:

Indrašienė Valdonė1ORCID,Jegelevičienė Violeta1ORCID,Merfeldaitė Odeta1ORCID,Penkauskienė Daiva1ORCID,Pivorienė Jolanta1ORCID,Railienė Asta1ORCID,Sadauskas Justinas1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Educational Sciences and Social Work, Faculty of Human and Social Studies, Mykolas Romeris University, Ateities st. 20, LT-08303 Vilnius, Lithuania

Abstract

The fragmentation and narrowness of research on critical thinking in the labour market and the lack of critical thinking analysis in the context of the interplay between lifelong learning, education and the labour market presuppose the relevance of this article. The article analyses the views of employers and employees, highlighting their attitude toward the importance and manifestation of critical thinking in the labour market and the need for improving critical thinking competency. The article aims to answer the following problematic questions: (1) How important are critical thinking skills and dispositions in the labour market? (2) How do employers’ and employees’ opinions vary regarding critical thinking in professional activities? (3) What need is there to improve critical thinking skills and dispositions? Quantitative research methodology was chosen for data collection using a questionnaire. It was found that both employers and employees consider inference and argumentation to be the most important critical thinking skills in the modern labour market; however, their attitude toward self-regulation, which is highly regarded by employees, but not by employers, is fundamentally different. Both employers and employees understand the importance of dispositions and value them similarly. Both groups have the least regard for having scepticism. The assessment of critical thinking skills and dispositions in specific professional activities differs from the assessment in the labour market in general. In professional activities, substantiated decisions, flexibility and unbiased decisions are especially valued by both groups, and the skills listed as being in most need of improvement are the same ones that were given as being important. The attitudes of both groups were distinguished by assigning value to dispositions that need improvement. Employees are more likely than employers to work on dispositions that denote operational autonomy. The study also revealed correlations between various groups of critical thinking skills and dispositions, demonstrating both employers’ and employees’ deliberate choice in assessing one or other constituent of critical thinking competence and the perception of their interrelationships.

Funder

European Social Fund

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Social Sciences

Reference39 articles.

1. Les Acquis De La Formation Doctorale: Perceptions Des compétences développées;Bangali;CJHE,2021

2. Barnett, Ronald (1997). Higher Education: A Critical Business, Open University Press.

3. Fostering Post-Secondary Vocational Students’ Critical Thinking through Multi-Level Tasks in Learning Environments;Bekbayeva;World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues,2021

4. Beyer, Barry K. (1987). Practical Strategies for the Teaching of Thinking, Allyn and Bacon.

5. The Interplay of Educational and Labour Market Institutions and Links to Relative Youth Unemployment;Journal of European Social Policy,2017

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The Impact of Career Education on Students' Labour Market Perceptions;Didaktika: Jurnal Kependidikan;2024-02-01

2. Relationships among critical thinking disposition components of Chinese undergraduates: A moderated mediating effect analysis;International Journal of Educational Research;2024

3. Who's in Charge?  A Career Development Practice Perspective in the ‘New Career’ Era;International Journal of Human Resource Development: Practice, Policy and Research;2023-12-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3