Affiliation:
1. Gaia, Solutions on Demand, Belo Horizonte 31310-260, Brazil
2. Vale S.A., Nova Lima 34006-049, Brazil
Abstract
This paper proposes an upper bound for mine productivity (useful for long-term planning) and also a simple truck dispatch rule (useful for short-term operations) that demonstrates how tight the upper bound can be using a simulation. It also proposes a greedy search to approximate the productivity upper bound, which is faster and often exact. Uncertainty is added to the simulation in order to verify how the productivity responds to it. Typically, the productivity’s upper bound is less tight close to its saturation point as a function of the number of trucks, where adding more trucks only increases queues. Furthermore, more uncertainty in the model typically leads to a less tight upper bound. The results conducted using real data from an open pit mine in Brazil show that the gap between the productivity upper bound and the productivity realization using the proposed dispatch rule for a homogeneous fleet can be less than 2%, but it can be as large as 12% near the productivity saturation point without uncertainty. Even though this gap seems to become arbitrarily small as the number of trucks and the simulation horizon increase, the productivity upper bound is never violated, which validates it as an upper bound and induces optimality for the dispatch rule.
Reference35 articles.
1. The mining industry after the boom;Humphreys;Miner. Econ.,2019
2. Overview of solution strategies used in truck dispatching systems for open pit mines;Alarie;Int. J. Surf. Mining Reclam. Environ.,2002
3. Hauck, R.F. (1973). Proceedings, Seminar on Scheduling in Mining, Smelting, and Steelmaking, Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.
4. Hauck, R.F. (1979). Computer Methods for the 80’s in the Mineral Industry, Society for Mining Metallurgy.
5. A methodology for the optimum control of shovel and truck operations in open-pit mining;Li;Min. Sci. Technol.,1990