Commonsense-Guided Inductive Relation Prediction with Dual Attention Mechanism
-
Published:2024-02-29
Issue:5
Volume:14
Page:2044
-
ISSN:2076-3417
-
Container-title:Applied Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Applied Sciences
Author:
Duan Yuxiao1ORCID, Tang Jiuyang1, Xu Hao1, Liu Changsen1, Zeng Weixin1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Laboratory for Big Data and Decision, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410072, China
Abstract
The inductive relation prediction of knowledge graphs, as an important research topic, aims at predicting the missing relation between unknown entities with many real-world applications. Existing approaches toward this problem mostly use enclosing subgraphs to extract the features of target nodes to make predictions; however, there is a tendency to ignore the neighboring relations outside the enclosing subgraph, thus leading to inaccurate predictions. In addition, they also neglect the rich commonsense information that can help filter out less convincing results. In order to address the above issues, this paper proposes a commonsense-guided inductive relation prediction method with a dual attention mechanism called CNIA. Specifically, in addition to the enclosing subgraph, we added the multi-hop neighboring relations of target nodes, thereby forming a neighbor-enriched subgraph where the initial embeddings are generated. Next, we obtained the subgraph representations with a dual attention (i.e., edge-aware and relation-aware) mechanism, as well as the neighboring relational path embeddings. Then, we concatenated the two embeddings before feeding them into the supervised learning model. A commonsense re-ranking mechanism was introduced to filter the results that conformed to commonsense. Extensive experiments on WN18RR, FB15k-237, and NELL995 showed that CNIA achieves better prediction results when compared to the state-of-the-art models. The results suggested that our proposed model can be considered as an effective and state-of-the-art solution for inductive relation prediction.
Reference35 articles.
1. Zhang, Y., Dai, H., Kozareva, Z., Smola, A.J., and Song, L. (2018, January 2–7). Variational Reasoning for Question Answering With Knowledge Graph. Proceedings of the Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2018), New Orleans, LA, USA. 2. Verlinden, S., Zaporojets, K., Deleu, J., Demeester, T., and Develder, C. (2021). Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL-IJCNLP 2021, Association for Computational Linguistics. 3. Wang, H., Zhao, M., Xie, X., Li, W., and Guo, M. (2019, January 13–17). Knowledge Graph Convolutional Networks for Recommender Systems. Proceedings of the WWW 2019, San Francisco, CA, USA. 4. Zhao, X., Zeng, W., and Tang, J. (2023). Entity Alignment—Concepts, Recent Advances and Novel Approaches, Springer. 5. On entity alignment at scale;Zeng;VLDB J.,2022
|
|