Leaf Area Index Estimation of Fully and Deficit Irrigated Alfalfa through Canopy Cover and Canopy Height

Abstract

In arid and semiarid regions, crop production has high irrigation water demands due to low precipitation. Efficient irrigation water management strategies can be developed using crop growth models to assess the effect of different irrigation management practices on crop productivity. The leaf area index (LAI) is an important growth parameter used in crop modeling. Measuring LAI requires specialized and expensive equipment not readily available for producers. Canopy cover (CC) and canopy height (CH) measurements, on the other hand, can be obtained with little effort using mobile devices and a ruler, respectively. The objective of this study was to determine the relationships between LAI, CC, and CH for fully and deficit-irrigated alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). The LAI, CC, and CH measurements were obtained from an experiment conducted at the Valley Road Field Lab in Reno, Nevada, starting in the Fall of 2020. Three irrigation treatments were applied to two alfalfa varieties (Ladak II and Stratica): 100%, 80%, and 60% of full irrigation demands. Biweekly measurements of CC, CH, and LAI were collected during the growing seasons of 2021 and 2022. The dataset was randomly split into training and testing subsets. For the training subset, an exponential model and a simple linear regression (SLR) model were used to determine the individual relationship of CC and CH with LAI, respectively. Also, a multiple linear regression (MLR) model was implemented for the estimation of LAI with CC and CH as its predictors. The exponential model was fitted with a residual standard error (RSE) and coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.97 and 0.86, respectively. A lower performance was obtained for the SLR model (RSE = 1.03, R2 = 0.81). The MLR model (RSE = 0.82, R2 = 0.88) improved the performance achieved by the exponential and SLR models. The results of the testing indicated that the MLR performed better (RSE = 0.82, R2 = 0.88) than the exponential model (RSE = 0.97, R2 = 0.86) and the SLR model (RSE = 1.03, R2 = 0.82) in the estimation of LAI. The relationships obtained can be useful to estimate LAI when CC, CH, or both predictors are available and assist with the validation of data generated by crop growth models.