Accuracy of Manual Snow Sampling, Depending on the Sampler’s Cross-Section—A Comparative Study

Author:

Kaasik Marko1ORCID,Meinander Outi2ORCID,Leppänen Leena23ORCID,Anttila Kati4ORCID,Dagsson-Waldhauserova Pavla56ORCID,Ginnerup Anders7,Hampinen Timo8,Liu Yijing9,Gunnarsson Andri10ORCID,Langley Kirsty7ORCID,Arslan Ali Nadir2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Physics, University of Tartu, 50411 Tartu, Estonia

2. Finnish Meteorological Institute, 00560 Helsinki, Finland

3. Arctic Centre, University of Lapland, 96100 Rovaniemi, Finland

4. Finnish Environment Institute, 00790 Helsinki, Finland

5. Faculty of Environmental and Forest Sciences, Agricultural University of Iceland, 311 Borgarnes, Iceland

6. Faculty of Environmental and Forest Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 16500 Prague, Czech Republic

7. Asiaq—Greenland Survey, Qatserisut 8, Nuuk 3900, Greenland

8. North Ostrobothnia Centre for Economic Development, Transport, and the Environment, Veteraanikatu 1, 9013 Oulu, Finland

9. Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, 1350 Copenhagen, Denmark

10. Landsvirkjun, Háaleitisbraut 68, 103 Reykjavík, Iceland

Abstract

Snow sampling, either by inserting a tube through the entire snowpack or by taking samples from the vertical profile, is widely applied to measure the snow depth, density, and snow water equivalent (SWE). A comparative study of snow-sampling methods was carried out on 24 March 2022 in Sodankylä, Finland. Six groups from five countries (Estonia, Finland, Greenland, Iceland, and Sweden) participated, using 12 different snow samplers, including 9 bulk tube samplers and 3 density cutters. The cross-sectional area of the SWE samplers varied from 11 to 100 cm2, while tube length varied from 30 cm to 100 cm. The cross-sectional area of the density profile cutters varied from 100 cm2 to 200 cm2 and the vertical sampling step varied from 5 cm to 10 cm. The samples were taken from snow pits in 55–65-centimeter-deep snow cover in a flat area with sparse pine trees, with the pits at a maximum distance of 10 m from each other. Each tube sampling series consisted of 3–10 vertical columns to ensure statistical validation. The snowpack was relatively soft, with two moderately hard crust layers. The density recorded in the tube sample measurements varied from 218 to 265 kgm−3. The measurement results of SWE, however, varied depending on the sampling equipment used, ranging from 148 to 180 kgm−2, with two outliers of 77 and 106 kgm−2, both with 11 cm2 samplers.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3