Abstract
For the interpretation of archaeological geophysical data as archaeological features, it is essential that the recorded anomalies can be clearly delineated and analyzed, and therefore, care has been taken to obtain the best possible data. However, as with all measurements, data are degraded by unwanted components, or noise. This review clarifies the terminology, discusses the four major sources of noise (instrument, use of instrument, external, soil), and demonstrates how it can be characterized using geostatistical and wavenumber methods. It is important to recognize that even with improved instruments, some noise sources, like soil noise, may persist and that degraded data may be the result of unexpected sources, for example, global positioning system synchronization problems. Suggestions for the evaluation and recording of noise levels are provided to allow estimation of the limit of detection for archaeological geophysical anomalies.
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Reference123 articles.
1. Oxford Advanced Learners Dictionary;Lea,2020
2. What is noise?
3. Limitations on Magnetic Prospection in Archaeology Imposed by Soil Properties;Graham;Archaeo Phys. Tech. Nat. Beiträge Feldarchäologie,1976
4. Magnetic modelling and error assessment in archaeological geophysics: The case study of Urbs Salvia, central Italy
5. L’évolution du Canton de Levroux d’après les Prospections et les Sondages Archéologiques—Levroux 1;Buchsenschutz,1988
Cited by
23 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献