Affiliation:
1. Department of Geological and Mining Engineering and Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931, USA
2. Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
Abstract
Multiple-point geostatistics (MPS) is an established tool for the uncertainty quantification of Earth systems modeling, particularly when dealing with the complexity and heterogeneity of geological data. This study presents a novel pixel-based MPS method for modeling spatial data using advanced machine-learning algorithms. Pixel-based multiple-point simulation implies the sequential modeling of individual points on the simulation grid, one at a time, by borrowing spatial information from the training image and honoring the conditioning data points. The developed methodology is based on the mapping of the training image patterns database using the t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE) algorithm for dimensionality reduction, and the clustering of patterns by applying the Density-based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise (DBSCAN) algorithm, as an efficient unsupervised classification technique. For the automation, optimization, and input parameter tuning, multiple stages are implemented, including entropy-based determination of the template size and a k-nearest neighbors search for clustering parameter selection, to ensure the proposed method does not require the user’s interference. The proposed model is validated using synthetic two- and three-dimensional datasets, both for conditional and unconditional simulations, and runtime information is provided. Finally, the method is applied to a case study gold mine for stochastic orebody modeling. To demonstrate the computational efficiency and accuracy of the proposed method, a two-dimensional training image with 101 by 101 pixels is simulated for 100 conditional realizations in 453 s (~4.5 s per realization) using only 361 hard data points (~3.5% of the simulation grid), and the resulting average simulation has a good visual match and only an 11.8% pixel-wise mismatch with the training image.
Funder
Michigan Technological University
Reference79 articles.
1. Daya Sagar, B.S., Qiuming, C., and Frits, A. (2018). Multiple-Point Statistics, Handbook of Mathematical Geosciences: Fifty Years of IAMG, Springer.
2. Soares, A. (1993). Multivariate Geostatistics: Beyond Bivariate Moments. Geostatistics Tróia ’92. Quantitative Geology and Geostatistics, Springer.
3. Strebelle, S. (2012, January 11–15). Multiple-Point Geostatistics: From Theory to Practice. Proceedings of the Ninth International Geostatistics Congress, Oslo, Norway.
4. Mariethoz, G., and Caers, J. (2015). Multiple-Point Geostatistics: Stochastic Modeling with Training Images, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.. [1st ed.].
5. Training Image Free High-Order Stochastic Simulation Based on Aggregated Kernel Statistics;Yao;Math. Geosci.,2021