Abstract
Background: In a cannot-ventilate-cannot-intubate situation, careful preoxygenation with high FiO2 allowing subsequent apneic oxygenation can be life-saving. The best position for an oxygen supply line within the human airway at which oxygen insufflation is more effective than standard preoxygenation with a face mask is unknown. Methods: In this experimental study, we compared the effectiveness of preoxygenation by placing an oxygen cannula at the nose entrance, through the nose at the soft palatine, or at the base of the tongue; as a control we used ambient air. We connected a fully preoxygenated test lung on one side to an oximeter with a flow rate of 200 mL/min simulating the oxygen consumption of a normal adult on the other side of the trachea of an anatomically correctly shaped airway manikin over a 20 min observation period five times for each cannula placement in a random order. Results: The oxygen percentage in the test lung dropped from 100% in all groups to 53 ± 1% in the ambient air control group, to 87 ± 2% in the nasal cannula group, and to 96 ± 2% in the soft palatine group; it remained at 99 ± 1% in the base of the tongue group (p = 0.003 for the soft palatine vs. base of the tongue and p < 0.001 for all other groups). Conclusions: When simulating apneic oxygenation in a preoxygenated manikin, oxygen insufflation at the base of the tongue kept the oxygen percentage at baseline values of 99%, demonstrating a complete block of ambient air flowing into the airway of the manikin. Oxygen insufflation at the soft palatine or insufflation via a nasal cannula were less effective regarding this effect.
Funder
German Research Foundation
Reference18 articles.
1. Death due to no airway;Anaesthesist,2010
2. Risk factors for and prediction of hypoxemia during tracheal intubation of critically ill adults;Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc.,2018
3. A Dual-Use Laryngoscope to Facilitate Apneic Oxygenation;J. Emerg. Med.,2014
4. Herff, H., Wetsch, W.A., Finke, S., Dusse, F., Mitterlechner, T., Paal, P., Wenzel, V., and Schroeder, D.C. (2021). Oxygenation laryngoscope vs. nasal standard and nasal high flow oxygenation in a technical simulation of apnoeic oxygenation. BMC Emerg. Med., 21.
5. A special oropharyngeal oxygenation device to facilitate apneic oxygenation in comparison to high flow oxygenation devices;Med. Gas. Res.,2022