A Comparative Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Methods for Personnel Selection: A Practical Approach

Author:

Pinto-DelaCadena Pablo A.12ORCID,Liern Vicente2ORCID,Vinueza-Cabezas Andrea3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Business School, Universidad Internacional del Ecuador, UIDE, Quito 170411, Ecuador

2. Departament Matamàtiques per a l’Economia i l’Empresa, Universitat de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain

3. Grupo de Investigación Bienestar, Salud y Sociedad, Escuela de Psicología y Educación, Universidad de Las Américas, Quito 170125, Ecuador

Abstract

This research focused on decision-making supported by multi-criteria decision methods, specifically TOPSIS, OWA, and their respective variants within personnel selection. The study presented models aimed at facilitating the selection of the best candidate for a job through competency-based assessments and comparing the application of four methods across various scenarios. We employed methods such as TOPSIS, OWA, and two variations (Canós–Liern method and an OWA model based on mathematically replicating expert opinion). Each model provided distinct rankings and demonstrated adaptability to specific situations within a company. Furthermore, it was emphasized that each method could and should be tailored according to the company’s reality to derive maximum benefit from its implementation. A crucial aspect of securing the best candidates involves understanding the context and identifying the appropriate methodology.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Mathematics,Engineering (miscellaneous),Computer Science (miscellaneous)

Reference30 articles.

1. Strategies of Renewal the Transition from “Total Quality Management” to the “Learning Organization”;Manag. Learn.,2005

2. Kim, D.H. (2009). The Link between Individual and Organizational Learning, Butterworth-Heinemann.

3. High Performance Work Systems and Organisational Performance: Bridging Theory and Practice;Boxall;Asia Pac. J. Hum. Resour.,2007

4. A Literature Review on HRM and Innovation–Taking Stock and Future Directions;Seeck;Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag.,2017

5. The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance;Huselid;Acad. Manag. J.,1995

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3