Comparison of the Applicability of J-M Distance Feature Selection Methods for Coastal Wetland Classification

Author:

Zhang Xianmei12,Lin Xiaofeng1ORCID,Fu Dongjie3ORCID,Wang Yang2,Sun Shaobo4ORCID,Wang Fei5,Wang Cuiping1,Xiao Zhongyong1,Shi Yiqiang1

Affiliation:

1. College of Harbour and Coastal Engineering, Jimei University, Xiamen 361021, China

2. School of Geographical Sciences, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007, China

3. State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environment Information System, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China

4. Institute of Surface-Earth System Science, School of Earth System Science, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

5. Institute of Agricultural Information and Economics, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No. 23788, Industrial North Road, Jinan 250010, China

Abstract

Accurate determination of the spatial distribution of coastal wetlands is crucial for the management and conservation of ecosystems. Feature selection methods based on the Jeffries-Matusita (J-M) method include J-M distance with simple average ranking (JMave), J-M distance based on weights and correlations (JMimproved), and heuristic J-M distance (JMmc). However, as the impacts of these methods on wetland classification are different, their applicability has rarely been investigated. Based on the Google Earth Engine (GEE) and random forest (RF) classifier, this is a comparative analysis of the applicability of the JMave, JMimproved, and JMmc methods. The results show that the three methods compress feature dimensions and retain all feature types as much as possible. JMmc exhibits the most significant compression from a value of 35 to 15 (57.14%), which is 37.14% and 40% more compressed than JMave and JMimproved, respectively. Moreover, they produce comparable classification results, with an overall classification accuracy of 90.20 ± 0.19% and a Kappa coefficient of 88.80 ± 0.22%. However, different methods had their own advantages for the classification of different land classes. Specifically, JMave has a better classification only in cropland, while JMmc is advantageous for recognizing water bodies, tidal flats, and aquaculture. While JMimproved failed to retain vegetation and mangrove features, it enables a better depiction of the mangroves, salt pans, and vegetation classes. Both JMave and JMimproved rearrange features based on J-M distance, while JMmc places more emphasis on feature selection. As a result, there can be significant differences in feature subsets among these three methods. Therefore, the comparative analysis of these three methods further elucidates the importance of J-M distance in feature selection, demonstrating the significant potential of J-M distance-based feature selection methods in wetland classification.

Funder

Young Scientists Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China

Natural Science Foundation for Young Scientists of Fujian Province

Education Department of the Fujian Province Science and Technology Project

Scientific Project from Fujian Provincial Department of Science and Technology

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Water Science and Technology,Aquatic Science,Geography, Planning and Development,Biochemistry

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3