Affiliation:
1. Department of Mechanical Engineering and Mechatronics, Ariel University, Ariel 407000, Israel
2. School of Mechanical Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
3. Department of Orthopedics, HaSharon Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva 49372, Israel
Abstract
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures are prevalent knee injuries, with approximately 200,000 ruptures annually, and treatment costs exceed USD two billion in the United States alone. Typically, the initial detection of ACL tears and anterior tibial laxity (ATL) involves manual assessments like the Lachman test, which examines anterior knee laxity. Partial ACL tears can go unnoticed if they minimally affect knee laxity; however, they will progress to a complete ACL tear requiring surgical treatment. In this study, a computational finite element model (FEM) of the knee joint was generated to investigate the effect of partial ACL tears under the Lachman test (GNRB® testing system) boundary conditions. The ACL was modeled as a hyperelastic composite structure with a refined representation of collagen bundles. Five different tear types (I–V), classified by location and size, were modeled to predict the relationship between tear size, location, and anterior tibial translation (ATT). The results demonstrated different levels of ATT that could not be manually detected. Type I tears demonstrated an almost linear increase in ATT, with the growth in tear size ranging from 3.7 mm to 4.2 mm, from 25% to 85%, respectively. Type II partial tears showed a less linear incline in ATT (3.85, 4.1, and 4.75 mm for 25%, 55%, and 85% partial tears, respectively). Types III, IV, and V maintained a nonlinear trend, with ATTs of 3.85 mm, 4.2 mm, and 4.95 mm for Type III, 3.85 mm, 4.25 mm, and 5.1 mm for Type IV, and 3.6 mm, 4.25 mm, and 5.3 mm for Type V, for 25%, 55%, and 85% partial tears, respectively. Therefore, for small tears (25%), knee stability was most affected when the tears were located around the center of the ligament. For moderate tears (55%), the effect on knee stability was the greatest for tears at the proximal half of the ACL. However, severe tears (85%) demonstrated considerable growth in knee instability from the distal to the proximal ends of the tissue, with a substantial increase in knee instability around the insertion sites. The proposed model can enhance the characterization of partial ACL tears, leading to more accurate preliminary diagnoses. It can aid in developing new techniques for repairing partially torn ACLs, potentially preventing more severe injuries.
Reference41 articles.
1. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Strain and Tensile Forces for Weight-Bearing and Non-Weight-Bearing Exercises: A Guide to Exercise Selection;Escamilla;J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther.,2012
2. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Prevention and Primary Prevention of Knee Osteoarthritis;Hootman;J. Athl. Train.,2012
3. Understanding and Preventing Acl Injuries: Current Biomechanical and Epidemiologic Considerations—Update 2010;Hewett;N. Am. J. Sports Phys. Ther.,2010
4. Mechanisms, Prediction, and Prevention of ACL Injuries: Cut Risk with Three Sharpened and Validated Tools;Hewett;J. Orthop. Res.,2016
5. Xu, D., Zhou, H., Quan, W., Gusztav, F., Wang, M., Baker, J.S., and Gu, Y. (2023). Accurately and Effectively Predict the ACL Force: Utilizing Biomechanical Landing Pattern before and after-Fatigue. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., 241.