Surfactant-Mediated Microalgal Flocculation: Process Efficiency and Kinetic Modelling
-
Published:2024-07-16
Issue:7
Volume:11
Page:722
-
ISSN:2306-5354
-
Container-title:Bioengineering
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Bioengineering
Author:
Maia Carolina12ORCID, Pôjo Vânia12, Tavares Tânia12ORCID, Pires José C. M.12ORCID, Malcata Francisco Xavier12
Affiliation:
1. LEPABE—Laboratory for Process Engineering, Environment, Biotechnology and Energy, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal 2. ALiCE—Associate Laboratory in Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Rua Dr Roberto Frias, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
Abstract
Microalgae are a valuable source of lipids, proteins, and pigments, but there are challenges in large-scale production, especially in harvesting. Existing methods lack proven efficacy and cost-effectiveness. However, flocculation, an energy-efficient technique, is emerging as a promising solution. Integrating surfactants enhances microalgal harvesting and disruption simultaneously, reducing processing costs. This study investigated cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide (DTAB), and sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) for harvesting Tetraselmis sp. strains (75LG and 46NLG). CTAB exhibits superior results, with 88% harvesting efficiency at 1500 and 2000 mg L−1 for 75LG and 46NLG, respectively, for 60 min of sedimentation—thus being able to reduce the operating time. Beyond evaluating harvesting efficiency, our study explored the kinetics of the process; the modified Gompertz model led to the best fit. Furthermore, the largest kinetic constants were observed with CTAB, thus highlighting its efficacy in optimising the microalgal harvesting process. With the incorporation of the suggested enhancements, which should be addressed in future work, CTAB could hold the potential to optimise microalgal harvesting for cost-effective and sustainable large-scale production, eventually unlocking the commercial potential of microalgae for biodiesel production.
Reference46 articles.
1. The effects of surfactants (sodium dodecyl sulfate, triton X-100 and cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide) on the dewaterability of microalgae biomass using pressure filtration;Taghavijeloudar;Bioresour. Technol.,2019 2. Dolganyuk, V., Belova, D., Babich, O., Prosekov, A., Ivanova, S., Katserov, D., Patyukov, N., and Sukhikh, S. (2020). Microalgae: A promising source of valuable bioproducts. Biomolecules, 10. 3. Dębowski, M., Zieliński, M., Kazimierowicz, J., Kujawska, N., and Talbierz, S. (2020). Microalgae cultivation technologies as an opportunity for bioenergetic system development—Advantages and limitations. Sustainability, 12. 4. Dammak, M., Hlima, H.B., Tounsi, L., Michaud, P., Fendri, I., and Abdelkafi, S. (2022). Effect of heavy metals mixture on the growth and physiology of Tetraselmis sp.: Applications to lipid production and bioremediation. Bioresour. Technol., 360. 5. Flow cytometry assay to evaluate lipid production by the marine microalga Tetraselmis sp. using a two stage process;Dammak;Renew. Energy,2021
|
|