Influence of Skin Marker Positioning and Their Combinations on Hip Joint Center Estimation Using the Functional Method

Author:

Martinez Lucas12ORCID,Lalevée Matthieu34ORCID,Poirier Thomas2,Brunel Helena2ORCID,Matsoukis Jean5,Van Driessche Stéphane6,Billuart Fabien17

Affiliation:

1. Unité de Recherche ERPHAN, UR 20201, UVSQ, 92380 Garches, France

2. Laboratoire d’Analyse du Mouvement, Institut de Formation en Masso-Kinésithérapie Saint Michel, 68 rue du Commerce, 75015 Paris, France

3. CETAPS UR3832, Research Center for Sports and Athletic Activities Transformations, University of Rouen Normandy, 76821 Mont-Saint-Aignan, France

4. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rouen University Hospital, 37 Bd Gambetta, 76000 Rouen, France

5. Département de Chirurgie Orthopédique, Groupe Hospitalier du Havre, BP24, 76083 Le Havre CEDEX, France

6. Polyclinique Sainte Marguerite, 5 Avenue de la Font Sainte-Marguerite, 89000 Auxerre, France

7. Université de Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, UFR Simone Veil-Santé, 20 Avenue de la Source de la Bièvre, 78180 Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France

Abstract

Accurate estimation of hip joint center (HJC) position is crucial during gait analysis. HJC is obtained with predictive or functional methods. But in the functional method, there is no consensus on where to place the skin markers and which combination to use. The objective of this study was to analyze how different combinations of skin markers affect the estimation of HJC position relative to predictive methods. Forty-one healthy volunteers were included in this study; thirteen markers were placed on the pelvis and hip of each subject’s lower limbs. Various marker combinations were used to determine the HJC position based on ten calibration movement trials, captured by a motion capture system. The estimated HJC position for each combination was evaluated by focusing on the range and standard deviation of the mean norm values of HJC and the mean X, Y, Z coordinates of HJC for each limb. The combinations that produced the best estimates incorporated the markers on the pelvis and on proximal and easily identifiable muscles, with results close to predictive methods. The combination that excluded the markers on the pelvis was not robust in estimating the HJC position.

Publisher

MDPI AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3