The Kinematics of Fixed-Seat Rowing: A Structured Synthesis

Author:

Agius Tonio P.1,Cerasola Dario23,Gauci Michael4,Sciriha Anabel1ORCID,Sillato Darren5,Formosa Cynthia56ORCID,Gatt Alfred56ORCID,Xerri de Caro John1ORCID,Needham Robert6,Chockalingam Nachiappan56ORCID,Grima Joseph N.47ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Malta, MSD 2080 Msida, Malta

2. Italian Rowing Federation, Viale Tiziano, 74, 00196 Rome, Italy

3. Department of Psychology, Educational Science and Human Movement, University of Palermo, 90100 Palermo, Italy

4. Metamaterials Unit, Faculty of Science, University of Malta, MSD 2080 Msida, Malta

5. Department of Podiatry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Malta, MSD 2080 Msida, Malta

6. Centre for Biomechanics and Rehabilitation Technologies, School of Health, Science and Wellbeing, Staffordshire University, Stoke-on-Trent ST4 2DF, UK

7. Siġġiewi Rowing Club, 181, Melita Street, VLT 1129 Valletta, Malta

Abstract

Olympic-style sliding-seat rowing is a sport that has been extensively researched, with studies investigating aspects related to the physiology, biomechanics, kinematics, and the performance of rowers. In contrast, studies on the more classic form of fixed-seat rowing are sparse. The aim of this study is to address this lacuna by analysing for the first time the specific kinematics of fixed-seat rowing as practised by able-bodied athletes, thus (i) documenting how this technique is performed in a manner that is replicable by others and (ii) showing how this technique compares and contrasts with the more standard sliding-seat technique. Fixed-seat rowing was replicated in a biomechanics laboratory where experienced fixed-seat rowers, marked with reflective markers following the modified Helen–Hayes model, were asked to row in a manner that mimics rowing on a fixed-seat boat. The findings from this study, complimented with data gathered through the observation of athletes rowing on water, were compared to sliding-seat ergometer rowing and other control experiments. The results show that, in fixed-seat rowing, there is more forward and backward thoracic movement than in sliding-seat rowing (75–77° vs. 44–52°, p < 0.0005). Tilting of the upper body stems was noted to result from rotations around the pelvis, as in sliding-seat rowing, rather than from spinal movements. The results also confirmed knee flexion in fixed-seat rowing with a range of motion of 30–35°. This is less pronounced than in standard-seat rowing, but not insignificant. These findings provide a biomechanical explanation as to why fixed-seat rowers do not have an increased risk of back injuries when compared with their sliding-seat counterparts. They also provide athletes, coaches, and related personnel with precise and detailed information of how fixed-seat rowing is performed so that they may formulate better and more specific evidence-based training programs to meliorate technique and performance.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Bioengineering

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3