Co-Clinical Imaging Metadata Information (CIMI) for Cancer Research to Promote Open Science, Standardization, and Reproducibility in Preclinical Imaging

Author:

Moore Stephen M.1,Quirk James D.1,Lassiter Andrew W.1,Laforest Richard1,Ayers Gregory D.2,Badea Cristian T.3ORCID,Fedorov Andriy Y.4ORCID,Kinahan Paul E.5,Holbrook Matthew3ORCID,Larson Peder E. Z.6ORCID,Sriram Renuka6ORCID,Chenevert Thomas L.7,Malyarenko Dariya7ORCID,Kurhanewicz John6ORCID,Houghton A. McGarry8,Ross Brian D.7ORCID,Pickup Stephen9,Gee James C.9,Zhou Rong9ORCID,Gammon Seth T.10ORCID,Manning Henry Charles10,Roudi Raheleh11,Daldrup-Link Heike E.11,Lewis Michael T.12ORCID,Rubin Daniel L.13ORCID,Yankeelov Thomas E.1415ORCID,Shoghi Kooresh I.16

Affiliation:

1. Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA

2. Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA

3. Quantitative Imaging and Analysis Lab, Department of Radiology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA

4. Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA

5. Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA

6. Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA

7. Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA

8. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA

9. Department of Radiology, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

10. Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA

11. Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA

12. Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Departments of Molecular and Cellular Biology and Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA

13. Departments of Biomedical Data Science, Radiology and Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA

14. Departments of Biomedical Engineering, Diagnostic Medicine and Oncology, Oden Institute for Computational and Engineering Sciences, Livestrong Cancer Institutes, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA

15. Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA

16. Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA

Abstract

Preclinical imaging is a critical component in translational research with significant complexities in workflow and site differences in deployment. Importantly, the National Cancer Institute’s (NCI) precision medicine initiative emphasizes the use of translational co-clinical oncology models to address the biological and molecular bases of cancer prevention and treatment. The use of oncology models, such as patient-derived tumor xenografts (PDX) and genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs), has ushered in an era of co-clinical trials by which preclinical studies can inform clinical trials and protocols, thus bridging the translational divide in cancer research. Similarly, preclinical imaging fills a translational gap as an enabling technology for translational imaging research. Unlike clinical imaging, where equipment manufacturers strive to meet standards in practice at clinical sites, standards are neither fully developed nor implemented in preclinical imaging. This fundamentally limits the collection and reporting of metadata to qualify preclinical imaging studies, thereby hindering open science and impacting the reproducibility of co-clinical imaging research. To begin to address these issues, the NCI co-clinical imaging research program (CIRP) conducted a survey to identify metadata requirements for reproducible quantitative co-clinical imaging. The enclosed consensus-based report summarizes co-clinical imaging metadata information (CIMI) to support quantitative co-clinical imaging research with broad implications for capturing co-clinical data, enabling interoperability and data sharing, as well as potentially leading to updates to the preclinical Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) standard.

Funder

NCI’s CIRP and ITCR programs

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Data Format Standardization and DICOM Integration for Hyperpolarized 13C MRI;Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine;2024-05-06

2. Ethical considerations of preclinical models in imaging research;Magnetic Resonance in Medicine;2023-11-20

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3