Affiliation:
1. Environmental Assessment and Planning Research Group, Berlin Institute of Technology (TU Berlin), Straße des 17. Juni, 10623 Berlin, Germany
Abstract
Achieving national targets on renewable energy poses several challenges, especially in multi-level governance environments. Incentives and specifications on wind energy development might cause uneven progress or even discrepancies. Therefore, governments have commenced adopting ‘positive planning’ to combine energy targets with spatial and land-use planning. Yet detailed discussions regarding wind energy development remain scarce. In this paper, I explore three explanatory case studies in Germany and Sweden, aiming to provide policymakers and planners with essential knowledge while presenting significant challenges and key lessons learned. Positive planning appears to center on a strong energy target focus, limited space, and a balanced approach, shaped by the sociopolitical context. While Germany has recently embraced positive planning, Sweden started ambitiously but is encountering planning and policy challenges. Planning agencies play a vital role in promoting wind energy targets at mid-scale levels, yet legally binding targets matter. Striking a balance between energy targets and addressing land-use concerns without disregarding them requires managing a delicate trade-off. Early communication and inter-agency collaboration, as seen in Sweden, might facilitate identifying compromises, navigating trade-offs between species protection and renewable energy and offering municipal incentives. Nonetheless, negotiating satisfactory spatial trade-offs for a long-term proof of concept remains a challenge.
Funder
German Research Foundation
Open Access Publication Fund of TU Berlin
the scholarship program of the German Federal Foundation for the Environment
Subject
Nature and Landscape Conservation,Ecology,Global and Planetary Change
Reference185 articles.
1. Policies, actors and sustainability transition pathways: A study of the EU’s energy policy mix;Lindberg;Res. Policy,2019
2. Fridays for Future aus nachhaltigkeitswissenschaftlicher Perspektive;Schneidewind;GAIA-Ecol. Perspect. Sci. Soc.,2019
3. Rebel with a cause: The framing of climate change and intergenerational justice in the German press treatment of the Fridays for Future protests;Tulloch;Media Cult. Soc.,2021
4. Association for International Affairs (2022, November 10). United in Diversity? National Responses to the European Energy Crisis: Climate Paper No. 16. Available online: https://institutdelors.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/20220530_AMO_United_in_diversity-3.pdf.
5. Congested spaces, contested scales—A review of spatial planning for wind energy in Ireland;Daly;Landsc. Urban Plan.,2016
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献