Controlling the Proximity of the Poor: Patterns of Micro-Segregation in Naples’ Upper-Class Areas

Author:

Pfirsch Thomas1

Affiliation:

1. Laboratoire de Recherche Sociétés et Humanités (LARSH), Campus des Tertiales, Université Polytechnique Hauts de France, rue des Cent Têtes, 59313 Valenciennes, France

Abstract

Naples has been described as a symbol of the weak segregation of Mediterranean cities, which are marked by microscale segregation rather than neighborhood segregation. This paper focuses on the upper-class areas of Naples where, besides vertical segregation, other patterns of micro-segregation can be found and remain understudied. In such areas, Disadvantaged groups still concentrate into streets, blocks and enclaves of poverty that have resisted gentrification despite their location in the heart of upper-class nieghborhoods. Though self-segregation of the urban élite has sharply increased with globalization and postfordist capitalism, such patterns of segregation in well-off areas are largely unexplored. The paper is based on a mixed method. It uses census data to map the residential location of disadvantaged groups in Naples upper-class areas at the local scale. It also draws on ethnographic fieldwork to analyze the Neapolitan élites’ attitudes towards the proximity of the poor. The paper shows that the spatial proximity of the poor has long been accepted and promoted by the city élite as a way of maintaining social control over their patronage. But it is increasingly stigmatized as this control through proximity becomes more difficult for the decaying traditional Neapolitan élite. Residential proximity is now associated with increasing segregation in the use of public spaces. The paper discusses the theory of élite Urban Secession in globalization. In Naples, rather than Secession, the élite play a game of proximity and distance with the poor, using space as a means of social control.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Nature and Landscape Conservation,Ecology,Global and Planetary Change

Reference38 articles.

1. «La ségrégation sociale a-t-elle augmenté? La métropole parisienne entre polarisation et mixité»;Soc. Contemp.,2006

2. Oberti, M., and Preteceille, E. (2016). La Ségrégation Urbaine, La Découverte.

3. The enclave, the citadel and the ghetto: What has changed in the Post-Fordist US City;Marcuse;Urban Aff. Rev.,1997

4. Marcuse, P., and Van Kempen, R. (1999). Globalizing Cities: A New Spatial Order?, Wiley-Blackwell.

5. Maloutas, T., and Karadimitriou, N. (2022). Vertical Cities, Edward Elgar Publishing.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3