Affiliation:
1. Department of Human and Engineered Environmental Studies, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8654, Japan
2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo 152-8550, Japan
Abstract
A thorough safety assessment of an automated driving system (ADS) is necessary before its introduction into the market and practical application. Scenario-based assessments have received significant attention in research. However, identifying sufficient critical scenarios for ADSs is a major challenge, especially for complex urban environments with a variety of road geometries, traffic rules, and traffic participants. To identify the critical scenarios in this complex environment, it is essential to understand the environmental factors that lead to safety-critical events (e.g., accidents and near-miss incidents). Thus, this study proposes a method for identification of critical scenario components by analyzing near-miss incident data and extracting environmental factors that induce driver errors. In this study, we applied the proposed method to a scenario, in which an ego vehicle makes a right turn at a signalized intersection with an oncoming vehicle approaching the intersection in left-hand traffic, as a case study. The proposed method identified two components (dynamic occlusion caused by oncoming right-turn vehicles and change in traffic lights) that were both critical and challenging for ADSs. The case study results showed the usefulness of the identified components and the validity of the proposed method, which can extract critical scenario components explicitly.
Subject
Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes,Computer Science Applications,Process Chemistry and Technology,General Engineering,Instrumentation,General Materials Science
Reference49 articles.
1. World Health Organization (2018). Global Status Report on Road Safety 2018, WHO.
2. SAE International (2023, July 31). J3016_202104: Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles. Available online: https://www.sae.org/standards/content/j3016_202104/.
3. Amersbach, C., and Winner, H. (2019, January 27–30). Defining required and feasible test coverage for scenario-based validation of highly automated vehicles. Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC), Auckland, New Zealand.
4. Maurer, M., Gerdes, J.C., Lenz, B., and Winner, H. (2016). Autonomous Driving: Technical, Legal, and Social Aspects, Springer.
5. Driving to safety: How many miles of driving would it take to demonstrate autonomous vehicle reliability?;Kalra;Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract.,2016