Identification of Critical Scenario Components Based on Driving Database Analysis for Safety Assessment of Automated Driving Systems

Author:

Yoshitake Hiroshi1ORCID,Shino Motoki2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Human and Engineered Environmental Studies, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8654, Japan

2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo 152-8550, Japan

Abstract

A thorough safety assessment of an automated driving system (ADS) is necessary before its introduction into the market and practical application. Scenario-based assessments have received significant attention in research. However, identifying sufficient critical scenarios for ADSs is a major challenge, especially for complex urban environments with a variety of road geometries, traffic rules, and traffic participants. To identify the critical scenarios in this complex environment, it is essential to understand the environmental factors that lead to safety-critical events (e.g., accidents and near-miss incidents). Thus, this study proposes a method for identification of critical scenario components by analyzing near-miss incident data and extracting environmental factors that induce driver errors. In this study, we applied the proposed method to a scenario, in which an ego vehicle makes a right turn at a signalized intersection with an oncoming vehicle approaching the intersection in left-hand traffic, as a case study. The proposed method identified two components (dynamic occlusion caused by oncoming right-turn vehicles and change in traffic lights) that were both critical and challenging for ADSs. The case study results showed the usefulness of the identified components and the validity of the proposed method, which can extract critical scenario components explicitly.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes,Computer Science Applications,Process Chemistry and Technology,General Engineering,Instrumentation,General Materials Science

Reference49 articles.

1. World Health Organization (2018). Global Status Report on Road Safety 2018, WHO.

2. SAE International (2023, July 31). J3016_202104: Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles. Available online: https://www.sae.org/standards/content/j3016_202104/.

3. Amersbach, C., and Winner, H. (2019, January 27–30). Defining required and feasible test coverage for scenario-based validation of highly automated vehicles. Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC), Auckland, New Zealand.

4. Maurer, M., Gerdes, J.C., Lenz, B., and Winner, H. (2016). Autonomous Driving: Technical, Legal, and Social Aspects, Springer.

5. Driving to safety: How many miles of driving would it take to demonstrate autonomous vehicle reliability?;Kalra;Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract.,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3