Individual Experiences with Being Pushed to Limits and Variables That Influence the Strength to Which These Are Felt: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study

Author:

Nakazawa Eisuke1,Mori Katsumi1ORCID,Akabayashi Akira12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biomedical Ethics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan

2. Division of Medical Ethics, School of Medicine, New York University, 227 East 30th Street, New York, NY 10016, USA

Abstract

In a 2021 survey, we found that “limit or suppression experiences” were related to a willingness to use enhancement technologies. However, the concept of “limit or suppression experiences” is vague and difficult to interpret in relation to neuroethics/enhancement. Thus, we aimed to better understand “limit or suppression experiences” and establish a robust philosophical concept of the topic. To do so, we exploratively investigated the concept to determine individual experiences with the presence or absence of sensing limits, investigate different ways in which limits can be sensed (factors of the sense of limits: “FSLs”), and identify factors that correlate with the strength of FSLs. Data from an Internet survey investigating respondents’ experiences with limits (1258 respondents) were analyzed using exploratory factor analysis and a linear regression model. Five variables were extracted as the FSLs. The highest regression coefficients were found between physical FSL and sports activities and between cognitive FSL and academics. The lowest regression coefficients were found between relational FSL and academics, sports activities, and arts and cultural activities. The results facilitate a detailed discussion of the motivations of enhancement users, and the extraction of the suppression experience opens new enhancement directions. Further normative and empirical studies are required.

Funder

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

Reference45 articles.

1. Academy of Medical Sciences, British Academy, Royal Academy of Engineering, and Royal Society (2012). Human Enhancement and the Future of Work. Report from a Joint Workshop Hosted by the Academy of Medical Sciences, the British Academy, the Royal Academy of Engineering and the Royal Society, The Academy of Medical Sciences. Available online: https://acmedsci.ac.uk/viewFile/publicationDownloads/135228646747.pdf.

2. President’s Council on Bioethics (2022, August 05). Beyond Therapy: Biotechnology and the Pursuit of Happiness. Available online: https://bioethicsarchive.georgetown.edu/pcbe/reports/beyondtherapy/.

3. Deutsches Referenzzentrum für Ethik in den Biowissenschaften (2002). Enhancement: Die Ethische Diskussion über Biomedizinische Verbesserungen des Menschen, Deutsches Referenzzentrum für Ethik in den Biowissenschaften. (In German).

4. Ethics of decoded neurofeedback in clinical research, treatment, and moral enhancement;Nakazawa;Am. J. Bioeth. Neurosci.,2016

5. Enhancement motivations for using prescription drugs among young adults in Nigeria;Dumbili;Int. J. Drug Policy,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3