Affiliation:
1. Hydrology and River Basin Management, TUM School of Engineering and Design, Technical University of Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany
2. Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science, Lund University, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden
Abstract
Modeling inland water quality by remote sensing has already demonstrated its capacity to make accurate predictions. However, limitations still exist for applicability in diverse regions, as well as to retrieve non-optically active parameters (nOAC). Models are usually trained only with water samples from individual or local groups of waterbodies, which limits their capacity and accuracy in predicting parameters across diverse regions. This study aims to increase data availability to understand the performance of models trained with heterogeneous databases from both remote sensing and field measurement sources to improve machine learning training. This paper seeks to build a dataset with worldwide lake characteristics using data from water monitoring programs around the world paired with harmonized data of Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2. Additional feature engineering is also examined. The dataset is then used for model training and prediction of water quality at the global scale, time series analysis and water quality maps for lakes in different continents. Additionally, the modeling performance of nOACs are also investigated. The results show that trained models achieve moderately high correlations for SDD, TURB and BOD (R2 = 0.68) but lower performances for TSM and NO3-N (R2 = 0.43). The extreme learning machine (ELM) and the random forest regression (RFR) demonstrate better performance. The results indicate that ML algorithms can process remote sensing data and additional features to model water quality at the global scale and contribute to address the limitations of transferring and retrieving nOAC. However, significant limitations need to be considered, such as calibrated harmonization of water data and atmospheric correction procedures. Moreover, further understanding of the mechanisms that facilitate nOAC prediction is necessary. We highlight the need for international contributions to global water quality datasets capable of providing extensive water data for the improvement of global water monitoring.
Funder
Mexican National Council for Science and Technology
Federal Department of Energy (SENER) through its funding “CONACYT-SENER Sustentabilidad Energética”
German Research Foundation
Technical University of Munich
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Reference111 articles.
1. UNEP (2016). A Snapshot of the World’s Water Quality: Towards a Global Assessment, United Nations Environment Programme.
2. UNEP (2021, February 15). GEMStat 2020. Website Data Portal. Available online: https://gemstat.bafg.de/applications/public.html?publicuser=PublicUser#gemstat/Stations.
3. G.S.U. Water Resources Center (1998). An Integrated Water-Monitoring Network for Wisconsin, University of Wisconsin.
4. EPA (2001). Elements of a State Water Monitoring and Assessment Program.
5. Gholizadeh, M.H., Melesse, A.M., and Reddi, L. (2016). A Comprehensive Review on Water Quality Parameters Estimation Using Remote Sensing Techniques. Sensors, 16.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献