Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity of Agricultural Land Eco-Efficiency: A Case Study of 128 Cities in the Yangtze River Basin

Abstract

Analysis of spatiotemporal heterogeneity and evolutionary characteristics of agricultural land eco-efficiency is of great significance for achieving a rational use of natural resources and coordinated development of the agricultural economy as well as the ecological environment. In this study, we construct the “ecological space–agricultural production–carbon emission” framework, incorporate carbon emission intensity as an undesired output into the evaluation index system of agricultural land eco-efficiency, calculate the eco-efficiency of agricultural land in 128 cities in the Yangtze River basin from 2009 to 2018 by adopting the super-efficiency SBM model, and discuss the spatial and temporal changes using methodology such as hotspot analysis and kernel density estimation by ArcGIS. The results show the following. The overall trend of agricultural land eco-efficiency in the Yangtze River basin is increasing year by year and still has potential for improvement. However, there are significant discrepancies among cities, with the eco-efficiency of the downstream being much higher than that of the midstream and upstream regions, and demonstrating the pattern of “big dispersion–small agglomeration”. Some cities are still facing pressure to improve the eco-efficiency of agricultural land. Correspondingly, this paper puts forward optimization recommendations: Firstly, the downstream cities should give full play to their geographical advantages, actively introduce advanced production technologies, and reasonably allocate agricultural resources. Secondly, the upstream and midstream regions should formulate reasonable regional strategies in accordance with their natural resource endowments to improve the ecological benefits of agricultural land and narrow the regional disparities. This paper gives targeted policy recommendations at the levels of paying attention to education of farmers, providing incentives for ecological planting, strengthening agricultural infrastructure construction, reasonably controlling the use of agricultural materials, and increasing investment in agricultural pollutant emission management.