Evaluation of Ground Motion Damage Potential with Consideration of Compound Intensity Measures Using Principal Component Analysis and Canonical Correlation Analysis

Author:

Liu Tingting1ORCID,Lu Dagang2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212100, China

2. School of Civil Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150090, China

Abstract

The primary motivation of this study is to develop a compound intensity measure (IM) to evaluate ground motion damage potential based on principal component analysis (PCA) and canonical correlation analysis (CCA). To illustrate this, this study examines the correlation among intragroup IMs and intergroup IMs, as well as the correlation between various IMs and response variables. A compound IM, which can be obtained by a linear combination of ten IMs in the log-scale, is utilized to measure the ground motion damage potential. Elastoplastic, bilinear and hysteretic models are utilized to determine peak deformation and hysteretic energy as the response variables of Single-Degree-of-Freedom (SDOF) systems. On the basis of the SDOF systems, the overall structural damage index is obtained by a nonlinear time–history analysis for two reinforced concrete moment frame systems. It is clear that the developed compound IM shows significantly high-level correlation with structural response. The better the correlations, the more one can measure the earthquake damage potential. A single IM alone inadequately characterizes structural damage, highlighting the necessity of multiple IMs to estimate the possibility of structural damage.

Funder

National Science Foundation of China

Jiangsu Provincial Double Innovation Program

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference60 articles.

1. Porter, K.A. (2003, January 6–9). An overview of PEER’s performance-based earthquake engineering methodology. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering, Francisco, CA, USA.

2. Comparing the adequacy of alternative ground motion intensity measures for the estimation of structural responses;Giovenale;Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn.,2004

3. Housner, G.W. (1975, January 18–20). Measures of Severity of Ground Shaking. Proceedings of the U.S. Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

4. Housner, G.W., and Jennings, P.C. (1982). Earthquake Design Criteria, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.

5. A new approach of selecting real input ground motions for seismic design: The most unfavourable real seismic design ground motions;Zhai;Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn.,2007

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3