Numerical Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Corbels Using Concrete Damage Plasticity: Sensitivity to Material Parameters and Comparison with Analytical Models

Author:

Neuberger Ygor Moriel1ORCID,Andrade Maykon Vinicius1,de Sousa Alex Micael Dantas2ORCID,Bandieira Mariana1,da Silva Júnior Edivaldo Pereira3ORCID,dos Santos Herisson Ferreira3,Catoia Bruna1,Bolandim Emerson Alexandro4ORCID,de Moura Aquino Vinicius Borges4ORCID,Christoforo André Luis1ORCID,de Araújo Ferreira Marcelo1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Civil Engineering, Federal University of Sao Carlos, Sao Carlos 13565-905, Sao Paulo, Brazil

2. Sao Carlos Engineering School, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Carlos 13566-590, Sao Paulo, Brazil

3. Federal Institute of Rondonia, Campus Ariquemes, Ariquemes 76870-000, Rondonia, Brazil

4. Department of Civil Engineering, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Ilha Solteira 15385-000, Sao Paulo, Brazil

Abstract

The Concrete Damage Plasticity (CDP) model is a widely used constitutive model to represent the non-linear behavior of concrete in numerical analysis. However, a limited number of studies compared the level of accuracy of numerical models with the main code provisions from the literature. In addition, the influence of CDP material parameters on the structural behavior of corbels was scarcely studied. This study proposes to evaluate the ability of numerical models using CDP to represent the structural behavior of corbels regarding the ultimate load, reinforcement deformation and failure mechanism. In addition, we compared the predictions of the numerical models with the ones from design code expressions regarding the ultimate capacity. For this, three test results of corbels from the literature were evaluated with numerical models using the CDP, as well as with analytical models from different code provisions. A sensitivity analysis—by changing the dilation angle (ψ) and shape factor (Kc)—was performed. The comparison between tested and predicted resistances with the proposed numerical modeling choices was equal to 1.04 with a coefficient of variation of 11%. On the other hand, the analytical models evaluated overestimated the corbel capacity by more than 62%, on average. Therefore, the proposed modeling choices provide better predictions of ultimate capacity than the evaluated analytical models and can be used to assess the corbel design under more complex boundary conditions.

Funder

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Brasil

Pró-Reitoria de Pesquisa, Inovação e Pós-Graduação of Instituto Federal de Rondônia

São Paulo Research Foundation

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Building and Construction,Civil and Structural Engineering,Architecture

Reference44 articles.

1. (2017). Projeto e Execução de Estruturas de Concreto Pré-Moldado (Standard No. ABNT NBR 9062).

2. PCI (2010). PCI Design Handbook, PCI—Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute. [7th ed.].

3. (2004). Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures—Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings (Standard No. EN 1992-1-1).

4. Performance of High-Strength Concrete Corbels;Foster;ACI Struct. J.,1996

5. Flexural Behaviour of Concrete Corbels Containing Steel Fibers or Wrapped with FRP Sheets;Campione;Mater. Struct. Constr.,2005

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3