Neighbourhood Sustainability Assessment Tools for Sustainable Cities and Communities, a Literature Review—New Trends for New Requirements-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Neighbourhood Sustainability Assessment Tools for Sustainable Cities and Communities, a Literature Review—New Trends for New Requirements

Published:2023-11-06 Issue:11 Volume:13 Page:2782
ISSN:2075-5309
Container-title:Buildings
language:en
Short-container-title:Buildings

Author:

Pulgar Rubilar Pablo¹,Jordán Vidal Manuel M.¹^ORCID,Blanco Fernández David²^ORCID,Osorio Ramirez Marisol³,Perillán Torres Luis²,Lizana Vial Marcela³,Lobos Calquin Danny²,Pardo Fabregat Francisco⁴,Navarro Pedreño Jose¹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Agrochemistry and Environment, Miguel Hernández University of Elche, Avd. Universidad s/n, 03202 Elche, Alicante, Spain

2. Department of Construction Sciences, Universidad Tecnológica Metropolitana, Dieciocho 161, Santiago 8330383, Chile

3. Doctoral Program in Local Development and International Cooperation, Universitat Jaume I, Av. Vicent Sos Baynat s/n, 12006 Castellón de la Plana, Castellón, Spain

4. Departament of Education, Universidad CEU Cardenal Herrera, C/Grecia 31, 12006 Castellón de la Plana, Castellón, Spain

Abstract

The aim of this documentary review was to determine the level of scientific production on environmental analysis tools and certifications for sustainable cities and communities, or “Neighbourhood Sustainability Assessment Tools”, worldwide between the years 2016 and 2023, considering as a precedent the appearance of the SDG 2030 and SDG 11. The analysis developed in this work was carried out based on WoS, Scopus and ScienceDirect. The eligibility of the results of 685 potential articles, in addition to complementary articles, was evaluated, leading to 27 selected reviews. Our analysis revealed the main and most recent results post implementation of sustainability measures, identifying limitations, success factors, trends and forecasts for the future selection, development or improvement of evaluation tools for the sustainability of human sites and describing strategies specific to local realities, which are valid from a global point of view but include the particularities of distinct communities in specific places.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Building and Construction,Civil and Structural Engineering,Architecture

Link

https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/13/11/2782/pdf

Reference101 articles.

1. WCED (1987). Brundtland Report, World Commission on Environment and Development; Oxford University Press, Brundlant.

2. (2022, December 21). Division for Sustainable Development UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs Sustainable Development in the 21st Century: Review of Implementation of Agenda 21 and the Rio Principles—Detailed Review of the Implementation of Agenda 21. Available online: http://www.un.org/esa/dsd/dsd_sd21st/21_pdf/Study_1_Agenda_21.pdf.

3. Social sustainability: A catchword between political pragmatism and social theory;Littig;Int. J. Sustain. Dev.,2005

4. Bringing the “missing pillar” into sustainable development goals: Towards intersubjective values-based indicators;Burford;Sustainability,2013

5. Unesco.org (2023, January 20). Four Dimensions of Sustainable Development. Available online: http://www.unesco.org/education/tlsf/mods/theme_a/popups/mod04t01s03.html.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Monitoring and enhancing spontaneous sustainability—a framework;Journal of Engineering and Applied Science;2024-06-21