Affiliation:
1. Department of Construction Management, College of Health and Human Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
Abstract
Most previous Reality Capture Technology (RCT) research in construction focuses on the technical aspects of data collection, processing, and post-processing, while fewer studies have explored stakeholder perceptions about adopting and implementing RCT. This research investigated the perceptions of various construction project stakeholders in the commercial and infrastructure sectors regarding the benefits of, and obstacles hindering, the adoption of RCTs. A survey was distributed to the membership of U.S.-based professional organizations. Exploratory Factor Analysis was implemented to investigate and confirm logical and consistent empirical groupings of the benefits and obstacles listed in the survey. In general, mean comparisons revealed consistency across stakeholder perceptions of the benefits and obstacles of RCTs. However, significantly different perceptions about the increased accuracy of prefabricated elements, RCTs not being a company priority, lack of company budget, and data collection being too time consuming were observed between stakeholder groups. The study identified several benefits to RCT adoption (including, but not limited to, reduced project risk, increased accuracy of prefabricated elements and installed work as well as increased speed of as-built document creation) that were not noted in previous studies. Several obstacles to RCT (including, but not limited to, RCT not being a company priority, lack of Owner/Client demand, inability to bill RCT costs to the project, and cost of hiring employees with the required skills) were not observed in previous studies.
Subject
Building and Construction,Civil and Structural Engineering,Architecture
Reference29 articles.
1. Reality Capture of Buildings Using 3D Laser Scanners;Almukhtar;Civileng,2021
2. Quality Management Technologies in Highway Construction: Stakeholders’ Perception of Utility, Benefits, and Barriers;Ogunrinde;Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr.,2021
3. Psomas, L., Trainor, R., and Alzraiee, H. (2022, January 9–12). Case Study: Assessing the Structural Condition of Steel Bridges Using Terrestrial Laser Scanner (TLS). Proceedings of the Construction Research Congress 2022, Arlington, VA, USA.
4. Leica Geosystems AG (2017). Reality Capture for Construction and Engineering Projects, Leica Geosystems.
5. Evaluation of image-based modeling and laser scanning accuracy for emerging automated performance monitoring techniques;Bohn;Autom. Constr.,2011