Selection of Response Reduction Factor Considering Resilience Aspect

Author:

Prasanth S.1ORCID,Ghosh Goutam1,Gupta Praveen Kumar2ORCID,Kumar Virendra3ORCID,Paramasivam Prabhu4ORCID,Dhanasekaran Seshathiri5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Civil Engineering, Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology Allahabad, Prayagraj 211004, India

2. Department of Civil Engineering, GLA University, Mathura 281406, India

3. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Harcourt Butler Technical University, Kanpur 208002, India

4. Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering and Technology, Mattu University, Mettu 318, Ethiopia

5. Department of Computer Science, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, 9037 Tromso, Norway

Abstract

The selection of an adequate response reduction factor (R) in the seismic design of a reinforced concrete building is critical to the building’s seismic response. To construct a robust structure, the R factor should be chosen based on the building’s resilience performance. Since no background was provided for the selection of R factors, the study focuses on the right selection of R factors in relation to the building’s functionality, performance level, and resilience. In this study, a high-rise building with multiple R factors (R = 3, 4, 5, and 6) is developed. Five potential recovery paths (RP-1 to RP-5) that matched the realistic scenario were used to estimate the building’s functionality. The building was subjected to uni and bi-directional loadings, and two design levels, Design Basic Earthquake (DBE) and Maximum Considered Earthquake were used to monitor the building’s response. According to the findings, a decrease in the lateral design force with the highest R results in a high ductility requirement and a substantial loss of resilience. The maximum R factor can be recommended under uni-directional loading up to 6, in which the building’s resilience is almost 50%, whereas under bi-directional loading and taking the recommended R factor decreased from 6 to 4.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Building and Construction,Civil and Structural Engineering,Architecture

Reference47 articles.

1. (2005). Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures (Standard No. ASCE/SEI 7-22).

2. (2004). Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance (Standard No. EN 1998-1).

3. (2016). Indian Standard Criteria for Earthquake Resistance Design of Structures (Standard No. IS: 1893. Part-1).

4. Performance-based evaluation of the response reduction factor for ductile RC frames;Mondal;Eng. Struct.,2018

5. Earthquake recurrence effect on the response reduction factor of steel moment frame;Abdollahzadeh;Asian J. Civ. Eng.,2018

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The effect of openings in URM infills on the seismic resilience of a reinforced concrete building;Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering;2024-07-17

2. Effect of radius of curvature on the seismic response of curved bridges;IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science;2024-06-01

3. Seismic behaviour of the curved bridge with friction pendulum system;Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering;2023-12-05

4. Comparative analysis of T-shaped base isolated building under far fault and near fault earthquake;Asian Journal of Civil Engineering;2023-10-26

5. Efficacy of a curved bridge with isolation bearing under seismic loading;Asian Journal of Civil Engineering;2023-10-11

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3