Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Civil Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
2. Faculty of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Ostrava, 708 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic
3. Faculty of Safety Engineering, Technical University of Ostrava, 708 30 Ostrava, Czech Republic
Abstract
The present research compared the behaviours of lightweight mortars based on ordinary Portland cement (OPC), calcium sulphoaluminate cement (CSAC), and calcium aluminate cement (CAC) containing expanded perlite and subjected to elevated temperatures. The perlite substituted natural sand in amounts of 25, 50, 75, and 100% by volume. The mortars were subjected to heating at up to 300 °C, 650 °C, and 1000 °C at a rate of 20 °C/min. The consistency and density of fresh mortars, compressive strength and density of hardened mortars after heating and cooling, and absorbability were assessed. Such a holistic testing approach is the main novelty of this research, which is related to the aforementioned mixtures and elevated temperatures. The main contribution of this article is a comparison of various cement types coupled with variations in the level of sand replacement with expanded perlite. In previous studies, comparisons were made in pairs of OPC-CSAC and OPC-CAC for normal-weight concrete. There is a gap in our knowledge of triple comparisons and lightweight cement composites which is filled by the current study. The use of OPC at up to 650 °C is recommended because it is the most common solution, its performance is similar to that of CAC, and it is cheaper than other solutions. Above 650 °C and up to 1000 °C, CAC is the only solution because it performs better than other cements. CSAC is not suitable for use at elevated temperatures because of its poor strength performance, even if it is the best solution from an environmental point of view. Sand replacement with perlite does not increase the strength performance under elevated temperatures, but its efficiency is different for various types of cement.
Funder
Narodowa Agencja Wymiany Akademickiej
Ministry of Education Youth and Sports
Subject
Building and Construction,Civil and Structural Engineering,Architecture
Reference88 articles.
1. Tao, H., Kaplan, D.L., and Omenetto, F.G. (2012). Fabrication of Nanostructures Using Natural Synthesis: Optical Materials Using Silk, Elsevier.
2. Pacheco-Torgal, F. (2013). Eco-Efficient Construction and Building Materials: Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), Eco-Labelling and Case Studies, Springer.
3. Poranek, N., Łaźniewska-Piekarczyk, B., Czajkowski, A., and Pikoń, K. (2021). Circular Economy for Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Bottom Ash (MSWIBA) Management in Mortars with CSA and CEM I, MSWIBA Glassy Phase, and DTG. Energies, 15.
4. Poranek, N., Łaźniewska-Piekarczyk, B., Lombardi, L., Czajkowski, A., Bogacka, M., and Pikoń, K. (2022). Green Deal and Circular Economy of Bottom Ash Waste Management in Building Industry—Alkali (NaOH) Pre-Treatment. Materials, 15.
5. Hydration Behavior and Strength Development of Supersulfated Cement Prepared by Calcined Phosphogypsum and Slaked Lime;Liao;J. Build. Eng.,2023
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献