User-Centric Innovation District Planning: Lessons from Brisbane’s Leading Innovation Districts

Author:

Esmaeilpoorarabi Niusha1ORCID,Yigitcanlar Tan2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Architecture, College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Tehran 1417935840, Iran

2. City 4.0 Lab, School of Architecture and Built Environment, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia

Abstract

Innovation districts are widely known as an effective land use type for fostering and sustaining knowledge and innovation economy growth in cities. Knowledge workers and the public are among the main stakeholders and key drivers for the growth of innovation districts. However, these groups’ needs are often not well considered in the top-down implementation of innovation districts. This paper aims to explore the user preferences and decision makers’ perspectives in innovation district planning, design, and development. The study tackles the question of which characteristics fulfil the responsibility of innovation districts toward both societies (reflecting user preferences) and cities (reflecting decision makers’ perspectives). As for the methodology, a case study approach was employed to collect the required data from three innovation districts in Brisbane, Australia. The data are qualitatively and quantitatively analysed. The analysis findings highlighted the similarities between user preferences and decision makers’ perspectives—e.g., usefulness of decentralisation, urbanism, mixed-use development, street life, and social interactions in innovation districts—and the differences that need to be carefully factored into the planning, design, and development of innovation districts with a user-centric approach.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Building and Construction,Civil and Structural Engineering,Architecture

Reference85 articles.

1. Creative industries, creative class and competitiveness;Bontje;Geoforum,2009

2. Complex spaces;Cooke;J. Open Innov.,2017

3. Public space design of knowledge and innovation spaces;Pancholi;J. Open Innov.,2015

4. Classifying innovation districts;Yigitcanlar;Land Use Policy,2021

5. The strategic dimensions of knowledge industries in urban development;Kunzmann;DISP Plan. Rev.,2009

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3