Affiliation:
1. Civil Engineering Discipline, School of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Curtin University, Perth 6102, Australia
2. Sustainable Engineering Group, School of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Curtin University, Perth 6102, Australia
Abstract
The global focus on geopolymer binder production has increased due to the adoption of waste materials and industrial byproducts. Given the gradual decline in the availability of fly ash and ground granular blast furnace slag (GGBFS) resulting from the decarbonization process in electricity and steel production, waste clay brick powder (WCBP) could be a viable substitute for these pozzolanic by-products. This study presents the economic and environmental benefits of the use of WCBP as a replacement for conventional pozzolanic by-products in geopolymer binder production by assessing its techno-eco-efficiency, environmental impact, and cost-effectiveness performances. The favorable mechanical characteristics exhibited by the fly ash–GGBFS–WCBP-based geopolymer binder emphasize the importance of assessing its sustainability alongside its technical viability. The study employed life cycle analysis (LCA), following ISO framework, and using the Simapro software 9.2, to evaluate the environmental implications of the use of WCBP-based geopolymer mixtures. Human toxicity emerged as the primary impact. Moreover, the analysis of life cycle costs highlighted key financial factors, with around 65–70% attributed to alkaline activators of the total cost. The production of alkaline activators was identified as a critical point for both environmental impact and economic considerations due to energy consumption. While WCBP-rich samples exhibit a 1.7–0.7% higher environmental impact compared to the control mix (CM), their high mechanical strength and cost-effectiveness make them technologically and economically efficient geopolymer mixes. In conclusion, the portfolio analysis for techno-eco-efficiency affirms that mixes containing 40%, 30%, and 20% WCBP are more efficient than those using 10% and 0% WCBP, respectively.
Reference54 articles.
1. Industrial Production of Recycled Cement: Energy Consumption and Carbon Dioxide Emission Estimation;Sousa;Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.,2023
2. USGS (2023, November 12). Cement Statistics and Information, Available online: https://www.Usgs.Gov/Centers/National-Minerals-Information-Center/Cement-Statistics-and-Information.
3. Alkali-Activated Binders: A Review. Part 1. Historical Background, Terminology, Reaction Mechanisms and Hydration Products;Jalali;Constr. Build. Mater.,2008
4. Geopolymers: Inorganic geopolymeric new materials;Davidovits;J. Therm. Anal.,1991
5. Hardjito, D. (2005). Studies on Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete. [PhD Thesis, Curtin University of Technology].
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献