Affiliation:
1. Architecture Department, College of Architecture and Design, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh 11586, Saudi Arabia
2. Linguistics and Translation Department, College of Humanities and Sciences, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh 12435, Saudi Arabia
Abstract
Sustainable building design has gained global significance as a strategy to address environmental challenges and promote healthier living spaces. This concept is particularly relevant in Saudi Arabia, where there is a growing emphasis on integrating sustainable practices into the design and operation of buildings, especially in educational settings. Amidst the global push for sustainability in workplaces, this study’s core lies in assessing and comparing the satisfaction levels with the indoor environmental quality (IEQ) of a Saudi Arabian higher education building against those in international green buildings, considering factors that comprise thermal comfort, air quality, lighting, acoustic quality, office arrangement, furnishings, cleanliness, and maintenance. Employing the Center for the Built Environment (CBE) IEQ survey tool, a comprehensive study was conducted among the building’s occupants. A literature review and benchmarking studies complemented this to gather data on international green buildings. This study aims to assess and compare the satisfaction levels with the IEQ of a Saudi Arabian higher education building against international green buildings. The comparative analysis aims to expose the commonalities and differences in satisfaction levels, exploring how various factors influence overall satisfaction with the IEQ. The research found that there is overall satisfaction with the IEQ parameters of the building under investigation, except with two parameters: acoustics and thermal comfort. The building is generally in alignment with the IEQ of international buildings. This research is presumed to contribute significantly to sustainability initiatives in educational buildings, fostering a healthier and more sustainable workplace environment.
Reference90 articles.
1. Aguilar, A.J., de la Hoz-Torres, M.L., Ruiz, D.P., and Martínez-Aires, M.D. (2022). Monitoring and Assessment of Indoor Environmental Conditions in Educational Building Using Building Information Modelling Methodology. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19.
2. Zhang, F., Liu, S., Hu, W., and Yadav, M. (2022). Editorial: Effects of Indoor Environmental Quality on Human Performance and Productivity. Front. Built Environ., 8.
3. Indoor Environment Quality Assessment in Classrooms: An Integrated Approach;Tahsildoost;J. Build. Phys.,2018
4. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) (2023, November 01). Sustainability at KAUST. Available online: https://www.kaust.edu.sa/en/study/sustainability.
5. López-Chao, V., and Pena, V.L. (2021). Purpose Adequacy as a Basis for Sustainable Building Design: A Post-Occupancy Evaluation of Higher Education Classrooms. Sustainability, 13.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献