Abstract
Existing buildings can reach a performance enhancement and extend their nominal service life through renovation measures such as seismic rehabilitation. In particular, when buildings have almost exhausted their service life, seeking an optimal solution should consider whether costs and environmental effects are worthwhile, or new construction is preferred. In this paper, a methodology to consider seismic hazard into probabilistic approaches for life-cycle analyses is presented considering the possibility of structural enhancement over an extended building lifespan. A life-cycle-based decision support tool for building renovation measures is developed and applied to a selected case study. Unlike standard “static” analyses, which in this work show shortcomings by underestimating impacts of vulnerable buildings, such an approach brings out environmental and economic advantages of retrofit measures designed to improve the structural performance.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Subject
Building and Construction,Civil and Structural Engineering,Architecture
Reference49 articles.
1. Global Status Report 2018https://www.unenvironment.org/resources/report/global-status-report-2018
2. People in the EU—statistics on housing conditionshttps://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/People_in_the_EU_-_statistics_on_housing_conditions
3. The Greenest Building: Quantifying the Environmental Value of Building Reusehttp://www3.cec.org/islandora-gb/en/islandora/object/islandora%3A1018
4. Comparative whole-building life cycle assessment of renovation and new construction
5. Life cycle assessment in the construction sector: A review
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献