Why Are PPP Projects Stagnating in China? An Evolutionary Analysis of China’s PPP Policies

Author:

Li Yougui1,Xu Erman1,Zhang Zhuoyou1,He Shuxian1,Jiang Xiaoyan1ORCID,Skitmore Martin2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Civil Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China

2. Faculty of Society and Design, Bond University, Robina, QLD 4226, Australia

Abstract

The Public–Private Partnership (PPP) model has significantly contributed to global infrastructure and public service provision. The evolution of the PPP model closely aligns with policy directives. China’s PPP policy evolution has included five stages: budding (1986–2000), fluctuating (2001–2008), steady (2009–2012), expanding (2013–2018), and stagnating (2019–present). This study employs bibliometric analysis and co-word analysis to examine 407 policies enacted by the Chinese government from 1986 to 2018. By extracting policy text keywords at various stages and constructing a co-word network matrix, this study delineates the distinctive characteristics of Chinese PPP policies across different epochs. It can be found that critical areas such as “government credit”, “contract spirit”, and “power supervision” are still underappreciated. The challenges confronting China’s PPP model are multifaceted, stemming from policy gaps that have led to substantial project difficulties. Although the government proposed a new mechanism for franchising in 2023, the new mechanism is only for new PPP projects, and the difficulties of existing PPP projects have not been solved. This study advocates for enhancements in project bankability, regulatory clarity, institutional environment improvement, contract spirit defense, and the development of the PPP-REITs model to address these issues.

Funder

Innovation Research Plan of Anhui Construction Engineering Group in China

Soft Science Research Plan of Hefei University of Technology

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference45 articles.

1. Risk Allocation in Public-Private Partnership Infrastructure Projects: Comparative Study;Ke;J. Infrastruct. Syst.,2010

2. Identifying critical factors affecting the effectiveness and efficiency of tendering processes in public-private partnerships (PPPs): A comparative analysis of Australia and China;Tingting;Int. J. Proj. Manag.,2016

3. Case study of government initiatives for PRC’s BOT power plant project;Wang;Int. J. Proj. Manag.,2000

4. Critical Success Factors for Tendering BOT Infrastructure Projects in China;Qiao;J. Struct. Financ.,2002

5. (2024, April 01). Decision of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on Several Important Issues Concerning Comprehensively Deepening. Available online: http://www.china.org.cn/china/third_plenary_session/2014-01/16/content_31212602.htm.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3