Influence of Temperature–Humidity Sensor Housing Depth on Concrete and Mortar Compressive Strength
-
Published:2023-11-01
Issue:11
Volume:13
Page:2762
-
ISSN:2075-5309
-
Container-title:Buildings
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Buildings
Author:
Kim Chaehyeon1ORCID, Song Yooseob2ORCID, Cho Junhwi1, Kim Hyunhwan3ORCID, Yeon Jaeheum1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Regional Infrastructure Engineering, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Republic of Korea 2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL 35899, USA 3. Department of Engineering Technology, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX 78666, USA
Abstract
Recent advancements in sensor technology have led to an increase in embedding sensors into construction materials for monitoring purposes in the construction industry. However, systematic research on the resulting changes to the material properties is still lacking. A previous study confirmed that the copper–nickel-plated housing of SHT-31 sensors affects the compressive strength of mortar. Moreover, it is necessary to conduct further research to determine if this analogous occurrence takes place in concrete. This study embedded temperature–humidity sensor housings in concrete at 10 mm, 20 mm, and 30 mm, before performing compression tests and a finite element analysis (FEA). The empirical findings indicate that the compressive strengths of concrete at 10 mm, 20 mm, and 30 mm depths were 26.1 MPa, 28.4 MPa, and 29.4 MPa, respectively. In contrast, the control concrete that did not have a sensor housing had a compressive strength of 31.9 MPa. In the case of mortar, a design strength of 28 MPa was achieved at a depth greater than 30 mm, while concrete reached this design strength at 20 mm. Based on these findings, embedding temperature–humidity sensor housings in concrete is recommended at depths greater than 20 mm from the surface. These results serve as important reference data for determining the optimal embedding depth of sensor housings in structures using cement-based materials.
Funder
The National Research Foundation of Korea
Subject
Building and Construction,Civil and Structural Engineering,Architecture
Reference32 articles.
1. Musarat, M.A., Hameed, N., Altaf, M., Alaloul, W.S., Al Salaheen, M., and Alawag, A.M. (2021, January 7–8). Digital Transformation of the Construction Industry: A Review. Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Application (DASA), Sakheer, Bahrain. 2. A review of technologies and applications for smart construction;Stankovski;Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Civ. Eng.,2018 3. IoT for structural health monitoring;Scuro;IEEE Instrum. Meas. Mag.,2018 4. Wang, M.L., Lynch, J.P., and Sohn, H. (2014). Sensor Technologies for Civil Infrastructures: Sensing Hardware and Data Collection Methods for Performance Assessment, Woodhead. 5. Lamonaca, F., Sciammarella, P., Scuro, C., Carni, D., and Olivito, R. (2018, January 16–18). Internet of things for structural health monitoring. Proceedings of the 2018 Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 and IoT, Brescia, Italy.
|
|