A Comparison of the Project Management Methodologies PRINCE2 and PMBOK in Managing Repetitive Construction Projects

Author:

Simonaitis Aivaras1,Daukšys Mindaugas1ORCID,Mockienė Jūratė12

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Kaunas University of Technology, 44249 Kaunas, Lithuania

2. Faculty of Engineering Sciences, Kaunas University of Applied Engineering Sciences, 50155 Kaunas, Lithuania

Abstract

Nowadays, companies employ various project management (PM) methodologies to ensure that their projects are effective and successful. It is worth knowing that differences in principles and processes of PM methodologies influence the use of different PMs in managing non-repetitive and repetitive construction projects. This paper presents the selection and application of a rational construction PM methodology to a repetitive construction project after a comparison of two PM methodologies, namely Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) and Projects IN Controlled Environments (PRINCE2). The object of this study is a repetitive anti-corrosion works project for steel structures conducted at Company X. The research was carried out in two steps. First, a quantitative survey of the respondents from companies involved in the management and execution of construction projects was conducted with the aim to identify a rational approach to construction PM. The questionnaire consisted of fourteen closed-ended questions, six of which were generic and eight were PMBOK- and PRINCE2-specific questions. Companies that took part in the quantitative study identified the PRINCE2 project management approach as the most suitable for managing a repetitive construction project. Using the PRINCE2 PM methodology, the repetitive construction project would aim to provide as much information as possible to the project participants, form a team and assign team leaders responsible for the phases, establish a financial plan, a detailed timetable for the execution of the works, a quality control plan, and a plan of responsible persons, and detail the technological sequencing of the works. Second, a quantitative study on the selection of a rational construction project management approach for a repetitive construction project was pursued, and a qualitative assessment of construction project monitoring trends and actions was conducted. The qualitative research was performed using a structured interview method and asking the representatives of different companies X, Y, and Z the same 15 questions. The results of the qualitative research showed that a successful PM depends on the size of the project team, the PM tools and methodologies used, the PM philosophy, and the frequency of monitoring and discussing the project progress.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Building and Construction,Civil and Structural Engineering,Architecture

Reference64 articles.

1. Application Project Management Methodology in Construction Sector: Review;Mhammed;Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res. IJSER,2016

2. Project Management Institute (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (Pmbok® Guide), Project Management Institute.

3. (2021, December 10). PRINCE2 Training: Construction Industry. Available online: https://www.prince2training.co.uk/blog/prince2-for-the-construction-industry/.

4. (2021, December 10). Knowledge Train®: PRINCE2® vs the PMBOK® Guide: A Comparison. Available online: https://www.knowledgetrain.co.uk/project-management/pmi/prince2-and-pmbok-guide-comparison.

5. Murray, A., Bennett, N., and Bentley, C. (2015). Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2, TSO.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Estimating the Duration of Construction Works Using Fuzzy Modeling to Assess the Impact of Risk Factors;Applied Sciences;2024-04-30

2. Unrealistic Project Goals: Detection and Modification;Journal of Construction Engineering and Management;2024-03

3. Causal relationship between environmental aspect and environmental risk;E3S Web of Conferences;2024

4. Project Management of the Information System for the Selection of Project Teams;2023 IEEE 12th International Conference on Intelligent Data Acquisition and Advanced Computing Systems: Technology and Applications (IDAACS);2023-09-07

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3