Infiltration Models in EnergyPlus: Empirical Assessment for a Case Study in a Seven-Story Building

Author:

Bastos Porsani Gabriela1ORCID,Fernández-Vigil Iglesias María1ORCID,Echeverría Trueba Juan Bautista1ORCID,Fernández Bandera Carlos2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Architecture, University of Navarra, 31009 Pamplona, Spain

2. School of Technology, Universidad de Extremadura, 10003 Cáceres, Spain

Abstract

The current decarbonization transition to be achieved by 2050 according to the European Council has given great prominence to the use of Digital Twins as tools for energy management. For their correct operation, it is essential to control the uncertainties of the energy models, which lead to differences between the measured and predicted data. One of the key parameters that is most difficult to assess numerically is air leakage. The existent infiltration models available in EnergyPlus were developed to be applied in low-rise residential buildings with fewer than three stories. Therefore, it is common to rely on air leakage equations employing predefined coefficients. This research presents an empirical assessment of the performance of two EnergyPlus air leakage models, the “Effective Leakage Area” and the “Flow Coefficient”, in predicting dynamic infiltration within the attic of a seven-story building. Blower door tests, along with the application of CO2 tracer gas, were conducted to establish coefficients for the models. Then, they were evaluated in three independent periods according to the criteria established in the American Society for Testing Material D5157 Standard. Those models that only used in situ coefficients consistently met the standard across all three periods, demonstrating for both equations their accurate performance and reliability. For the best model derived from tracer gas data, the R2 and NMSE values are 0.94 and 0.019, respectively. In contrast, the model developed using blower door test data and EnergyPlus default values presented a 64% reduction in accuracy compared to the best one. This discrepancy could potentially lead to misleading energy estimates. Although other software options exist for estimating infiltration, this study specifically targets EnergyPlus users. Therefore, these findings offer valuable insights to make more informed decisions when implementing the infiltration models into energy simulations for high-rise buildings using EnergyPlus.

Funder

“Asociación de Amigos de la Universidad de Navarra” of the University of Navarra, Spain

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Building and Construction,Civil and Structural Engineering,Architecture

Reference69 articles.

1. European Commission and Directorate-General for Energy (2019). Clean Energy for All Europeans, European Commission. Technical Report.

2. European Commission (2020). COM(2020) 562 Final: Stepping up Europe’s 2030 Climate Ambition. Investing in a Climate-Neutral Future for the Benefit of Our People, Technical Report.

3. Hou, L., Wu, S., Zhang, G., Tan, Y., and Wang, X. (2020). Literature review of digital twins applications in construction workforce safety. Appl. Sci., 11.

4. Review of digital twin about concepts, technologies, and industrial applications;Liu;J. Manuf. Syst.,2021

5. Tahmasebinia, F., Lin, L., Wu, S., Kang, Y., and Sepasgozar, S. (2023). Exploring the Benefits and Limitations of Digital Twin Technology in Building Energy. Appl. Sci., 13.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3