Inhibiting Factors to the Implementation of Preferential Procurement Policy in the South African Construction Industry

Author:

Tau Lebogang Joseph1,Ogunbayo Babatunde Fatai1ORCID,Aigbavboa Clinton Ohis1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. cidb Centre of Excellence & Sustainable Human Settlement and Construction Research Centre, Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2092, South Africa

Abstract

The South African preferential procurement policy emerged from the demand for transparency, fair competition, value-for-money, standardised and benchmark pricing, and regulation of public procurement arrangements in the construction industry. The policy aims to address historical inequalities, support economic growth, and foster sustainable development. The effectiveness of the preferential procurement policy in South Africa is affected by the inhibiting factors of its implementation system. Given this, this study assesses the factors inhibiting preferential procurement policy implementation in the South African construction industry. This study reviewed the extant literature from online databases as a secondary data source to identify and understand the factors inhibiting procurement policy implementation. A quantitative research design using a closed-ended survey questionnaire surveyed 31 identified inhibiting factors affecting procurement policy implementation from the literature review. One hundred sixty-seven (167) questionnaires were retrieved from two hundred (200) distributed, representing an 83.5 per cent response rate, distributed through Google Forms to the respondents in Northwest Province, South Africa. The reliability of the data collection instrument was determined using Bartlett’s sphericity, Cronbach’s alpha, and Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin tests. The exploratory factor analysis findings established eight components from the 31 identified inhibiting factors affecting procurement policy implementation, which are the absence of due diligence in procurement screening, corruption and political interference in procurement systems, an ineffective regulatory framework supporting public procurement policy, discrepancies in award of contracts and the absence of dispute resolution, ambiguity in procurement selection criteria, poor enforcement mechanisms, cost discrepancies in advance payment, and excessive bureaucracy in procurement documentation. This study’s practical implications provide an understanding of establishing and prioritising procurement selection criteria, such as project requalification requirements, cost performance requirements, technology integration in the prequalification process, and contract change order requirements, which would improve procurement systems in the South African construction industry.

Publisher

MDPI AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3