Affiliation:
1. School of Built Environment, Massey University, Auckland 0632, New Zealand
Abstract
This paper describes an empirical experiment of Internet of Things (IoT)’s integration in the Post-Occupancy Evaluation (POE) process. The experiment aimed to trial a novel IoT approach to enabling building user responsiveness to prevalent IEQ for individualised comfort. The purpose is to provide a system that mitigates a common issue of centralised air conditioning that limits occupants’ control over their immediate environment. To achieve this, an IoT platform was developed with smart IEQ monitoring sensors and wearable devices and trialled with PhD researchers in a shared university workspace. The findings provided empirical evidence of IoT’s enhanced benefits to improving user control over their individual comfort and enabling positive energy behaviour in buildings. Specifically, the IoT system provided real-time insight into CO2 concentration data while enabling responsive occupant interaction with their immediate environment and at-the-moment mitigation actions. Outputs of the experiment showed that the perceptions of participants about the stuffiness of the air, productivity, and healthy environment were significantly better after taking the mitigation action compared to before. Also, we found a significant relationship between measured CO2 concentration readings and perceived air stuffiness (p = 0.004) and productivity (p = 0.006) and a non-significant relationship between CO2 concentration readings and perceived healthy environment (p = 0.058). Interestingly, we observed that irrespective of the similarities in recorded CO2 concentration readings being within acceptable ranges (632–712 ppm), the perception of air stuffiness significantly differed (p = 0.018) before and after the mitigation actions. The effectiveness of the developed IoT platform was evidenced as most of the participants found the process very easy to participate in with little interruptions to their work as little time was consumed. The results are useful in modifying approaches to building occupant comfort and energy behaviour in commercial and residential settings.
Funder
International Visitors Research Fund (IVRF), Massey University
Reference75 articles.
1. Marchetti, N., Cavazzini, A., Pasti, L., Catani, M., Malagù, C., and Guidi, V. (2015, January 3–5). A campus sustainability initiative: Indoor air quality monitoring in classrooms. Proceedings of the 2015 XVIII AISEM Annual Conference, Trento, Italy.
2. Machine learning approaches to predict thermal demands using skin temperatures: Steady-state conditions;Dai;Build. Environ.,2017
3. Occupant productivity and office indoor environment quality: A review of the literature;Arif;Build. Environ.,2016
4. Agoplan, N. (2024, June 06). Don’t Breathe Easy: The Adverse Effects of Poor Indoor Air Quality. RenewAire Energy Recovery Ventilation. Available online: https://www.renewaire.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/MAR_LIT_107_RGB_White_Paper_Adverse_Effects_of_Poor_Indoor_Air_Quality.pdf.
5. Temperature and indoor environments;Salthammer;Indoor Air,2022