Abstract
It is increasingly important for researchers and educators to find effective ways to stimulate students’ creativity. In design education, the specificity of design, defined as open-ended problems and ill-defined problems, provides a special opportunity to improve creativity. Nevertheless, design education itself encounters other issues concerning creativity, such as not specifying in detail what creative design pedagogy should be. Thus, a comprehensive review of existing studies is needed to guide research in this field better. We used bibliometric analysis to provide information on literature statistics of the 658 articles published in design research–related journals between 1982 and 2022. An in-depth review of the 36 selected articles revealed the existing research on the design studio to investigate creativity from three perspectives: (1) creativity criteria and evaluation, (2) idea generation and development, and (3) pedagogy in the design studio. This study provides a roadmap for global educators and researchers focusing on pedagogy that enhances students’ creativity in the design studio.
Funder
The Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea
Subject
Building and Construction,Civil and Structural Engineering,Architecture
Reference86 articles.
1. Commentary: Divergent thinking is not synonymous with creativity.
2. Shape emergence and symbolic reasoning using maximal lines;Gero,1992
3. Dynamic aspects of design cognition: Elements for a cognitive model of design;Visser,2004
4. Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution
5. Creativity.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献