Affiliation:
1. Construction Dispute Resolution Research Unit, Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, 83 Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon 999077, Hong Kong
2. Future of Work Institute, Faculty of Business & Law, Curtin University, Perth 6000, Australia
Abstract
Construction 4.0 presents a multitude of opportunities; however, it also increases the chance of disputes. Efficient dispute management contributes to the sustainable production of construction works. Enhancing negotiation management and negotiators’ settlement ability is valuable, given that negotiation is recognized as the most effective dispute resolution method. This study explores negotiation settlement by identifying negotiators’ settlement facilitating elements in construction dispute negotiation (CDN). A purposive literature review identified six key elements, naming preparation, integration, goodwill, continuity, commitment, and self-efficacy. With data collected from experienced construction dispute negotiators, the partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) results confirmed the significance of these elements. Accordingly, recommendations for negotiators include (i) technique (i.e., good preparation and applying integrative tactics); (ii) interaction (i.e., showing goodwill and relationship maintenance); and (iii) attitude (i.e., commitment to negotiate and being confident) if the negotiation settlement is desired. Management can implement these recommendations in their training manual to cultivate negotiators’ problem solving and settlement-oriented mindset. Negotiators can also review their behaviors throughout the negotiations and make timely adjustments as deemed necessary. Reaching an amicable negotiated settlement would not only save resources, preserving business relationships is of equal importance for a sustainable construction industry.
Funder
Australian Research Council
Subject
Building and Construction,Civil and Structural Engineering,Architecture
Reference94 articles.
1. Investigating major challenges for industry 4. 0 adoption among construction companies;Demirkesen;Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag.,2022
2. Maskuriy, R., Selamat, A., Ali, K.N., Maresova, P., and Krejcar, O. (2019). Industry 4.0 for the Construction Industry—How Ready Is the Industry?. Appl. Sci., 9.
3. Industrial Revolution 4.0 in the construction industry: Challenges and opportunities for stakeholders;Alaloul;Ain Shams Eng. J.,2020
4. Wang, K., and Guo, F. (2022). Towards sustainable development through the perspective of construction 4.0: Systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. Buildings, 12.
5. RICS (2021, February 24). More Common, More Costly: Is COVID-19 Causing Conflict in the Construction Sector?. Available online: https://www.rics.org/es/wbef/megatrends/markets-geopolitics/more-common-more-costly-is-covid-19-causing-conflict-in-the-construction-sector/.