Affiliation:
1. Department of Interior Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, Near East University, TRNC Mersin 10, Nicosia 99138, Turkey
2. Faculty of Architecture and Fine Arts, Final International University, TRNC Mersin 10, Kyrenia 99320, Turkey
Abstract
In both industry and academia, sustainability has become a priority in the interior design and architecture industry, having a significant impact on society. However, most recent studies on building sustainability focus mainly on environmental and economic issues, with social sustainability often being complicated and overlooked in relevant research. This paper argues that there is a need for workplace design guidance that prioritizes parameters at the intersection of twenty-first-century workforce–corporate interests, embodying the notion of social sustainability within the built environment. Through this perspective, the physical environment is considered the container of its social content, and its features and characteristics have a direct impact on the quality of life and work for office workers. Although international currents in the age of globalization have stimulated tangible progress in the context of sustainability, the interior design of most design and architecture offices in Jordan suffers from an underrepresentation of the distinctive features of socially sustainable, user-welcoming interior spaces and environments. The current study explores the experiences of interior design professionals in Jordan through four windows of “Physiological Health and Comfort”, “Efficiency and Ergonomics”, “Privacy and Social Interaction”, and “Spatial Organization (Design)” from a quantitative perspective. A survey was developed to investigate these criteria and was administered among 145 full-time design professionals working in offices in Amman, Jordan. The study aimed to investigate the experiences of these practitioners in relation to their office work environment, with a focus on exploring Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ), Quality of Work Life (QWL), and Quality of Life (QoL) from the perspective of social sustainability. Descriptive statistics, correlations, and regression models were employed to analyze the survey data and evaluate the findings. Overall, the study highlights the need for theoretical and practical incentives to promote the adoption of socially sustainable development in workplace design, particularly in the context of interior design in Jordan. By focusing on the experiences of interior design professionals with their workplace environment, this study provides valuable insights for the development of workplace design guidelines that prioritize social sustainability parameters within the built environment.
Subject
Building and Construction,Civil and Structural Engineering,Architecture
Reference112 articles.
1. Munasinghe, M. (2009). Sustainable Development in Practice: Sustainomics Methodology and Applications, Cambridge University Press.
2. United Nations (1987). Brundtland Commission Report: Our Common Future; World Commission on Environment and Development, United Nations. General Assembly Documents, A/42/427.
3. Jaeger, C.C., Tàbara, J.D., and Jaeger, J. (2011). European Research on Sustainable Development: Volume 1: Transformative Science Approaches for Sustainability, Springer.
4. Exploring Social Sustainability: Learning from Perspectives on Urban Development and Companies and Products;Weingaertner;Sustain. Dev.,2014
5. McGuinn, J., Fries-Tersch, M.C.E., Jones, M.C.M., and Crepaldi, M.C.C. (2020). Social Sustainability—Concepts and Benchmarks, European Parliament.