Trends in Rescue and Rehabilitation of Marsupials Surviving the Australian 2019–2020 Bushfires

Author:

Cope Holly R.1ORCID,McArthur Clare2ORCID,Gray Rachael1ORCID,Newsome Thomas M.2ORCID,Dickman Christopher R.2ORCID,Sriram Aditi3ORCID,Haering Ron3ORCID,Herbert Catherine A.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Sydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia

2. School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia

3. New South Wales Department of Climate Change, Energy the Environment and Water, National Parks and Wildlife Service, Parramatta, NSW 2150, Australia

Abstract

The 2019–2020 Australian bushfire season had a devastating impact on native wildlife. It was estimated that 3 billion native animals were impacted by the fires, yet there are few estimates of the number of animals that were rescued and rehabilitated post-fire. Focusing on the state of New South Wales (NSW) and Kangaroo Island, South Australia, we used a case study approach to determine the number of marsupials that were reported rescued due to the 2019–2020 bushfires in these areas and analysed species-specific trends in rescue and release success. In NSW, we found 889 reports of fire-affected marsupials in 2019–2020, mostly comprising kangaroos and wallabies (macropods; n = 458), koalas (n = 204), and possums (n = 162), with a smaller number of wombats (n = 43) and other marsupial species. Most reports of fire-affected marsupials occurred 6–8 weeks after fire ignition, and there was no difference in temporal frequency of rescues between marsupial groups. For the three main groups, the probability of survival and subsequent release differed, with macropods having the lowest probability of release after rescue (0.15 ± 0.04) compared to koalas (0.47 ± 0.04) and possums (0.55 ± 0.10). The type of injury was the main predictor of survival during rehabilitation for all three marsupial groups, with those malnourished/moribund or with traumatic injuries less likely to survive rehabilitation. Death or euthanasia occurred on the day of rescue for 77% of macropods, 48% of possums and 15% of koalas. Koalas most often died during rehabilitation rather than on the day of rescue, with 73% either dying or being euthanised between day 1 and 30 post-rescue, representing a potential welfare concern. On Kangaroo Island, koalas were the most frequently rescued marsupial species; most euthanasia cases and deaths occurred in a hospital, whereas other marsupials were mostly euthanised at triage. In both jurisdictions, koalas were over-represented while possums were under-represented relative to baseline population densities and wildlife rescue trends in the years before the 2019–2020 bushfires. These species differences in presentation post-fire warrant further investigation, as do the differences in triage, survival and release outcomes. It is hypothesised that the high intensity and large scale of the 2019–2020 fires impeded marsupial fire evasion tactics, as evidenced by the small number of animals found for rescue, and the differing rates of presentation relative to underlying population densities for the main marsupial groups. Based on our findings, there is a need for detailed record keeping and data sharing, development of consistent and evidence-based triage, treatment and euthanasia guidelines and deployment of trained wildlife emergency rescue teams with advanced search techniques to minimise animal suffering where safe to do so.

Funder

Morris Animal Foundation Australian Wildlife

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference95 articles.

1. Impact of 2019–2020 mega-fires on Australian fauna habitat;Ward;Nat. Ecol. Evol.,2020

2. Woinarski, J. (2020, December 11). From the Ashes: The 2019–20 Wildfires and Biodiversity Loss and Recovery. Available online: https://www.nespthreatenedspecies.edu.au/news/from-the-ashes-the-2019-20-wildfires-and-biodiversity-loss-and-recovery.

3. Impacts of the 2019–2020 bushfires on New South Wales biodiversity: A rapid assessment of distribution data for selected invertebrate taxa;Hyman;Tech. Rep. Aust. Mus. Online,2020

4. van Eeden, L., Nimmo, D., Mahony, M., Herman, K., Ehmke, G., Driessen, J., O’Connor, J., Bino, G., Taylor, M., and Dickman, C. (2020). Impacts of the Unprecedented 2019–2020 Bushfires on Australian Animals, Report Prepared for WWF-Australia.

5. Impact of Australia’s catastrophic 2019/20 bushfire season on communities and environment. Retrospective analysis and current trends;Filkov;J. Saf. Sci. Resil.,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3