Movements after Captive Bolt Stunning in Cattle and Possible Animal- and Process-Related Impact Factors—A Field Study
Author:
Lücking Anika12ORCID, Louton Helen2ORCID, von Wenzlawowicz Martin1ORCID, Erhard Michael3ORCID, von Holleben Karen1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. bsi Schwarzenbek—Training and Consultancy Institute for Animal Welfare at Transport and Slaughter, Grabauer Str 27A, 21493 Schwarzenbek, Germany 2. Animal Health and Animal Welfare, Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Rostock, Justus-von-Liebig-Weg 6b, 18059 Rostock, Germany 3. Animal Welfare, Animal Behavior, Animal Hygiene and Animal Husbandry, Department of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, LMU Munich, 80539 Munich, Germany
Abstract
Movements in cattle after captive bolt stunning cause problems in the slaughter process and lead to uncertainties in assessing stunning effectiveness. The objective of this study was to categorize and quantify these movements and determine animal- and process-related impact factors, as well as connections to stunning effectiveness and shooting position. In total 2911 cows, heifers, and bulls (dairy, beef, and crossbreeds) were examined (mean age 3.02 years). Movements from landing until at least four minutes after sticking were recorded by action cams (Apeman® A100). Nine movement categories were defined (“kicking hind limb”, “twitching”, “bending and stretching hind limb”, “lifting and bending forelimb”, “body arching laterally”, “body arching ventrally”, and “arching backwards”). According to the movement severity, a score was assigned to each category. The scores were summed, either for certain process intervals, e.g., LANDING (ejection from the stunning box), HOISTING, or STICKING, or for the total time between LANDING and end of the FOURTH MINUTE OF BLEEDING (sum score). Statistical analysis (ANOVA) was performed on the scores. Only 6.6% of cattle showed no movement. Most movements occurred during STICKING and FIRST MINUTE OF BLEEDING, occurring rarely up to 8 min after sticking. While cows moved most at LANDING, bulls and heifers moved more if all process intervals were considered. The sum score was highest in German Angus, Charolais, and Limousin and lowest in Brown Swiss and Simmental. The score at LANDING was highest in German Angus and Black Holstein. The use of pneumatic stunners and an increase in bolt-exit length significantly reduced movements. No impact of stunning effectiveness on movements was found, but only 19 cattle showed reduced effectiveness.
Funder
Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (Germany)
Reference43 articles.
1. EFSA (2020). Welfare of Cattle at Slaughter, EFSA Panel on Animal Health Welfare. 1831-4732. 2. (2024, April 03). Council Regulation (EC) No 1099/2009 of 24 September 2009 on the protection of animals at the time of killing. 2009, 1–30. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A32009R1099. 3. Grist, A., Lines, J.A., Bock, R., Knowles, T.G., and Wotton, S.B. (2019). An Examination of the Performance of Blank Cartridges Used in Captive Bolt Devices for the Pre-Slaughter Stunning and Euthanasia of Animals. Animals, 9. 4. (2012). Tierschutz-Schlachtverordnung. TierSchlV-Verordnung zum Schutz von Tieren im Zusammenhang mit der Schlachtung oder Tötung zur Durchführung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1099/2009 des Rates. BGBl, 1, Available online: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/tierschlv_2013/. 5. (2023, November 01). Commission Regulation (EC) No 1326/2001 of June 2001 laying down transitional measures to permit the changeover to the Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council (EC) No 999/2001 laying down rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies, and amending Annexes VII and XI to that Regulation. (2000/418/EG). Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/DE/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A32001R1326.
|
|